We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.
© 2016 Shmoop University, Inc. All rights reserved.
Their Eyes Were Watching God

Their Eyes Were Watching God

  

by Zora Neale Hurston

Analysis: Writing Style

Lofty; Down to Earth

Yup, lofty and down to earth. It's a combination that sounds odd at first—but hey, the combination of chocolate and peanut butter probably sounded weird until people realized it was amazing.

And this combo, in Hurston's genius hands, totally works.

If you think about Zora Neale Hurston's choice of writing style, you can definitely put your finger on two distinct voices in Their Eyes Were Watching God. One of these voices—the narrator's—is lyrical, philosophical, and almost classical. The other voice—which we might say is shared by the characters in the novel—is down to earth, colloquial, and real.

You can get a good idea of what we mean by checking out the first page of Chapter 2:

Janie saw her life like a great tree in leaf with the things suffered, things enjoyed, things done and undone. Dawn and doom was in the branches.

"Ah know exactly what I got to tell yuh, but it's hard to know where to start at." (2.1-2)

Here, we get two very different voices smooshed together on the same page. The narrator's voice identifies an elegant simile, letting us know that Janie sees her life, and the things in it, as a tree. When Janie herself begins to speak to the reader directly, Hurston switches style abruptly, capturing the sound of Janie's speech phonetically (in other words, writing as it might sound to hear her). Instead of "I," we get "Ah." Instead of "you," we get "yuh." We also get a sentence that ends on a preposition ("at")—something we know the narrator would never do.

So, what's up with that? Well, despite these differences, it's important to recognize that the narrator is describing Janie's thoughts, while Janie herself is giving us her words. In both cases, we're dealing with the same character.

Think about why that might be an important aspect of this book for Hurston, who is writing to celebrate the lives of the black characters in this book. By staying true to their speech, she's representing their characters and refusing to change it for a more formal-minded audience.

At the same time, though, Hurston's narrator, with her lofty insights, is letting us know that—despite what someone might think about people with thick accents or who might speak informally—the inner lives of these characters are more lyrical than Shakespeare or Rilke.

People who Shmooped this also Shmooped...