We can add the same number to both sides of an equation without causing harm to the equation or ourselves. Not true if we're trying to add a fork to an electrical outlet.
A line segment that splits an angle in half so that it creates two congruent angles.
The first step in an inductive proof. We take the smallest or simplest value in our set, usually n
= 1, and prove that our general statement is true with that value. Also a great name for a rap group that specializes in inductive proofs. "Ladies and gents, please welcome to the stage…Base Case
." (Cue wild applause.)
A compound proposition that says if
the hypothesis is true, then
the conclusion will be true. It's surprisingly popular for a statement with so many conditions for hanging out. In symbols, it's p
Exactly equal in measure or identical. #twinsies
Two statements joined together by the word "and." Both parts of the conjunction must be true for the entire statement to be true. That's the truth, and
don't you forget it.
A conditional statement where the hypothesis and conclusion switch places and
a big "not" is put before both of them: ~q
, or not q
→ not p
A conditional statement where the hypothesis and conclusion switch places. It's like Wife Swap in the math world: q
-value that disproves the general statement in an inductive proof. It ruins the entire proof, like a drop of garbage water in a batch of cookies.
The idea that we can separate the conclusion and hypothesis from the conditional statement itself. The law might exist, but it will only be obeyed if there exist people that can obey it and
it's passed. Just the same, the hypothesis only leads to the conclusion if both the hypothesis and
the conditional statement are true.
Two statements joined together by the word "or." Only one statement has to be true for the disjunction to be true. Or was that some other type of statement? (No, it wasn't.)
We can divide both sides of an equation by any number as long as it's not zero. If we divide by zero, we could be blamed for the apocalypse.
Also called a two-column proof, it's a proof arranged in the form of—you guessed it!—two columns. One lists the statements you're claiming as true and the other lists the reasons for why they're true.
A proof that proves that the opposite of what it really wants to prove is false. Basically, it proves a claim by proving that the opposite isn't true. Talk about beating around the bush.
The second step in an inductive proof. We assume our initial statement is true when n
. Yep, it's the one area in math where you're allowed to say, "It's true because I said so
Also called a paragraph proof, it's a proof that takes the form of—you guessed it!—a paragraph. Think more stream-of-consciousness and less Excel spreadsheet. It's still a proof though, so make sure to give your reasons.
A conditional statement where "not" is placed before both the hypothesis and conclusion: ~p
, or not p
→ not q
A point that bisects a line segment into two congruent segments. It's the halfway point.
We can multiply both sides of an equation by the same number without messing with the truth of the equation.
Putting "not" into a proposition to make it mean the opposite of the original statement. If you get too many negations together, they tend to not not not not not not be annoying.
An assumption we make about whatever objects we're talking about that's treated as a fact. "Axiom" is its alter-ego.
An argument laid out step-by-step or in paragraph form that explains why something is true. Just like the courtroom scenes in Law and Order
, except with math.
Proof By Contradiction
A type of proof where we assume that the thing we're trying to prove is not
true, and then show how that assumption leads to some kind of logical contradiction. Also goes by the nicknames indirect proof
and Lyin' Larry
Proof By Deduction
A type of top-down reasoning where we start with a general theory or statement, then apply it to a specific example. Sherlock is a big fan.
Proof By Induction
A type of bottom-up reasoning where we start with a specific statement and use it to prove a general theory. First we prove the base case, then we assume the general theory is true when n
, and we wrap things up by proving the theory is true when n
Simply put, things are exactly what they are. Everything equals itself. A
. Bubba Gump shrimp
= Bubba Gump shrimp
. Convincing (and delicious), right?
If two things are equal, they are interchangeable. That means one can be substituted for another. How else would we have been able to solve for all those variables in algebra?
It's the green light for subtracting the same number from both sides of an equation. It can be 0 or it can be 5 million, but as long as we're doing the same thing to both sides of the equation, it doesn't make a difference.
A shortcut to conditional statements. If p
, instead of going through each one separately, it allows us to say directly that p
This gets to the true concept of equality. If A
, then B
. As long as the equal sign keeps them apart (how sad!), it doesn't matter what side they land on.
A fact that's already been proven. With theorems, all the work has already been done for us.
In the simplest terms, if A
, then A
. Sort of obvious, but super useful.