<em>Lord Jim</em> is all about storytelling. There are stories within stories within stories and then some. As characters tell their stories to our narrator, Marlow, they struggle to find the right words to say just what they mean, and what they have witnessed. Marlow, on the other hand, never seems at a loss for words as he retells their stories to his audience. Perhaps he's such a good storyteller because he is an excellent listener. The dude remembers <em>everything</em>, and everything comes back to our protagonist, Jim. We readers put each individual story that Marlow hears into the larger story of Jim – his rise and fall as a sailor, and his rise and fall on Patusan. By the end of the novel, we've had to do some serious puzzle work, sure, but we also are rewarded with a rich, multilayered story of a complicated protagonist and the ripple effect his life creates on those around him.
Questions About Language and Communication
- Do you think Marlow's account of Jim is entirely accurate? Do we get any hints that Marlow is holding back from us, or that Jim holds back from him?
- Jim pauses a lot and brushes over things during his Patna story. Why do you think he does this? Is he ashamed? Is his memory faulty?
- Marlow often speaks for other people and uses their own words in his story. What is the effect of referencing so many different sources? Does this clarify our understanding of Jim? Or do all the different voices only complicate his character?
- Besides Marlow, who else is a storyteller in Lord Jim? Do these storytellers have different techniques? Do their methods of storytelling reveal anything about them as characters?
Chew on This
Marlow is a classic unreliable narrator. He always puts his own spin on events, and his view of Jim is totally biased. Therefore, it's impossible to find out who Jim really is.
Conrad includes so many stories within stories and jumps around in the narrative to show that it is impossible to get a full picture of a character. We can only know the Jim that others see.