From 11:00PM PDT on Friday, July 1 until 5:00AM PDT on Saturday, July 2, the Shmoop engineering elves will be making tweaks and improvements to the site. That means Shmoop will be unavailable for use during that time. Thanks for your patience!
We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.
© 2016 Shmoop University, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Plague

The Plague


by Albert Camus


Character Role Analysis

The Plague

The plague kills everybody it can. It’s hard to wipe out. It makes life difficult for everyone. No one likes it. It creates obstacles for Dr. Rieux and the other characters. Tarrou says it best when he claims that in the world there are men, and there is pestilence, and you’re either fighting on one side or on the other. You don’t really have to scratch your head over this one.

The Ignorance and Inaction of Mankind

Just when you thought you were done. Actually, Tarrou also argues that many of the problems in the world are the result of men that have the plague and don’t know it, or men that know it but are content to leave things as they are. In a novel that promotes acute awareness, radical freedom, and constant, active choice, passivity and apathy are clear antagonists.


No, we’re not going to say Father Paneloux is the antagonist; according to The Plague, he is as much a victim of religion as anyone else. Religion is antagonistic because it distracts, it blinds. It allows people to wallow in a passive acceptance of God’s plan without acting or fighting against suffering in the world. Religion isn’t necessarily antagonistic to the humanist philosophy, but the form we see in The Plague certainly is.