From 11:00PM PDT on Friday, July 1 until 5:00AM PDT on Saturday, July 2, the Shmoop engineering elves will be making tweaks and improvements to the site. That means Shmoop will be unavailable for use during that time. Thanks for your patience!
We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.
© 2016 Shmoop University, Inc. All rights reserved.
Points, Vectors, and Functions

Points, Vectors, and Functions

Graphing Parametric Equations

Graphing parametric equations is similar to graphing vector functions.

One way to graph parametric equations is to find points for certain values of t, graph those points, then play connect-the-dots. The points will usually give an idea of the shape of the graph. Then we know whether to connect the dots with straight lines or with curves.

We can label the points with their t-values and put arrows on the connecting lines or curves to show the order in which the points are drawn.

It's also possible to graph parametric functions when given graphs instead of formulas for the component functions f(t) and g(t).

The graph of x = f(t) has t- and x-axes.
The graph of g has t- and y-axes.

We take information from these graphs and build a new graph with x- and y-axes.

One way to collect the information we need for the new graph is to build a table of values like we did before.

Instead of using formulas to calculate the values of x and y at particular t values, we read the values of x and y off their respective graphs.

How do we know the lines are straight?

If the functions x = f(t) and y = g(t) are both made up of straight line segments, then the graph of the parametric function will also be made up of straight line segments.

Take our word on that for now. We'll justify it when we talk about slopes of parametric functions.

Making a table of values can help keep the t and the x and the y straight. However, it's not necessary.

As long as we're careful, we can go straight from the graphs of f(t) and g(t) to the final graph of <f(t), g(t)>.

People who Shmooped this also Shmooped...