From 11:00PM PDT on Friday, July 1 until 5:00AM PDT on Saturday, July 2, the Shmoop engineering elves will be making tweaks and improvements to the site. That means Shmoop will be unavailable for use during that time. Thanks for your patience!
We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.
© 2016 Shmoop University, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman

The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman

  

by Laurence Sterne

The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman Theme of Science

Let's just say that no one adheres to the scientific process in Tristram Shandy. Knowledge is one thing—it can be good or bad—but Shandy-style science is guaranteed to be useless. Reason and empiricism (think the scientific method) were super important, and Tristram cites a number of famous scientists and up-to-date discoveries, as well as some outdated theories. It's almost as though Tristram is setting up his novel against science: both offer ways of understanding the world, and it's pretty clear which one is winning.

Questions About Science

  1. Does science or medicine do any good in the novel? Does anyone benefit from it?
  2. What is the difference between science and knowledge? Is "science" a subset of knowledge, or are they two different fields entirely?
  3. Toby's military understanding is sometimes referred to as "science." Does military science get treated any more respectfully than medical science?

Chew on This

Try on an opinion or two, start a debate, or play the devil’s advocate.

Dr. Slop's portrayal in the novel is evidence that Tristram Shandy disapproves of science.

In Tristram Shandy, science is not just something to be mocked—it's actively dangerous.

People who Shmooped this also Shmooped...

Advertisement