# Reducing Fractions

There are tons of ways to represent any one fraction. How do we choose which to use? It'll depend on the problem, but it's often helpful to **simplify **or **reduce** the fraction.

We know that if we start with a fraction and multiply the numerator and denominator each by the same number *n*, we'll get a fraction that's equivalent to . This also works in reverse: if the whole number *n* divides evenly into both *p* and *q*, then dividing *p* and *q* each by *n* will create a new fraction equivalent to . Let's turn this alphabet soup into some actual numbers, shall we?

### Sample Problem

Can we reduce the fraction ?

Hmm...4 and 6 are both divisible by 2. Divide each by 2 to get a fraction equivalent to .

Easy peasy—that's .

To simplify or reduce a fraction , we carry out this process until there are no natural numbers *n* left (except 1) that divide both *p* and *q*. It is now in **lowest terms. **This fraction would win the limbo every time.

How to systematically reduce fractions:

Rather than just eyeballing a couple of numbers and using the trial and error method, we can save ourselves some time by finding the biggest number *n* that divides both the numerator and the denominator. Ho there—this is something we've seen before! The number *n* is the **GCF**, or the greatest common factor of the numerator and denominator. In the improv world, we call this a "callback." (We like to pretend we're a part of the improv world. Just humor us.)

To quickly figure out the GCF of the numerator and denominator, write out the **prime factorizations** of the numerator and denominator. The GCF is what you get when you multiply all the prime factors shared by both numerator and denominator. It's all about the overlap.

### Sample Problem

We can see that 3 divides into both the numerator and the denominator. When we go ahead and divide the numerator and denominator each by 3, we get . This process is also called "canceling out" the 3s from the top and bottom of the fraction. Apparently, they didn't get very good ratings. They were really just appealing to the prime number demographic.

### Sample Problem

Check the overlap. We can cancel out one 2 and one 3 from both the numerator and denominator to get:

There's a huge benefit to this process of canceling out the common prime factors to arrive at a reduced fraction. Even though there are many, many equivalent fractions representing the same rational number, there's only *one* fully reduced fraction! It's like you've been dating around and have met plenty of perfectly nice guys, but finally you've found "the one." And all you had to do was reduce him to practically nothing. Oh happy day!