Tired of ads?
Join today and never see them again.
Don't front around Margaret Sanger.
She addresses two levels of hypocrisy in "The Children's Era." First, she calls out her listeners (and on another level, society as a whole) for acting like they care about kids and yet taking charitable social action to improve living conditions only once piles and piles of babies are already born, rather than getting to the root of the problem and making sure all these unwanted, uncared for kids aren't conceived in the first place.
She also calls out the people who say they care about families and yet are actively opposed to birth control…which Sanger sees as the one thing that can lead to happy families. You want happy families, asks Sanger? Better not stand in the way of birth control.
Sanger presents evidence to show that both her listeners and her opponents are guilty of hypocrisy.
For Sanger, the antidote to hypocrisy is action.
This theme is kind of unavoidable when you're talking about childbearing, right?
The element of womanhood at issue in "The Children's Era" is motherhood. Over and over, Sanger emphasizes that there's no hope for the future of children, the family, or civilization itself unless women can decide for themselves whether and when they become mothers.
Remember that old saying, "If Mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy"? Sanger would wear that on a t-shirt.
Sanger uses the language of slavery and emancipation to give weight to her arguments.
Sanger's insistence that only a healthy and willing mother can produce healthy children is her primary appeal to those concerned with the future of the nation-state.
Woohoo! We made it to the fun theme! Or, wait...sorry.
For a second we thought this might be all about Saturday morning cartoons and sledding and waiting up for Santa, but...it's not. Instead, we're dealing with the flip side of childhood: turns out, kids are really vulnerable, and "The Children's Era" really highlights that.
Her main concern about children is that so many are being born that no one can care for them all, not their parents and not even the charitable organizations meant to provide assistance. She wants to get right down to the root of the problem and make sure children are born only to parents who want them and who are emotionally, physically, and financially prepared to care for them.
She sees this as a fundamental right of children and sees birth control as one means toward creating a world of healthy, happy children. A world where those Saturday morning cartoons and sledding and waiting up for Santa are a reality instead of an ideal.
Sanger's thoughts on children and childhood remain relevant to us today.
Sanger's thoughts on children and childhood are dated by her views on poverty.
Yeah, it's a real downer of a theme. It brings to mind the Great Depression and The Grapes of Wrath, neither of which arrives all that far after 1925.
Poverty was nothing new in 1925 and it's nothing old today. Poverty and lack of access to birth control coupled with a lack of money to support lots of children has been a big theme forever and ever in American politics and life. Sanger is no more supportive of the poor relying on public assistance for their children's welfare than the average conservative politician.
But in "The Children's Era" she is supportive of providing the poor with birth control to limit the size of their families—and perhaps even in coercing them to do so. Poverty is no laughing matter, but it is kind of funny-weird to think that Sanger was advocating for women's choices even as she had clear ideas about what those choices should be.
Sanger's comments about poor children may be offensive, but her concerns about parents being able to support their children are nonetheless valid.
Sanger's speech is a symptom of the concern about policing the sexuality of the poor.