ShmoopTube

00:00

Thank you We sneak in Sorry And here's your smoke

00:08

too Sure brought to you by expressionism Don't let the

00:12

name fool you it's Not any faster than other types

00:15

of art All right Checking the following passage police and

00:18

her paper on art art who you ask No knight

00:23

named cuba's blah blah blah And one more block to

00:29

cover the last paragraph block Then we're done All right

00:33

What change needs to be made to sentence hen and

00:36

here the potential answers Russians really coming All right let's

00:42

take a quick peek at sentence Ten expressionist painters like

00:46

pollock and rothko are also well known for their very

00:50

abstract paintings Well we'll get this going Bye Nixing answer

00:55

D no doubt about it Uh this sense needs a

00:58

change All right Well that's that option a isn't the

01:01

change needed Police uses the right term when she describes

01:05

the painters as expressionist If she called them expressionistic it

01:09

would mean that the painters themselves were just a zab

01:12

strack informa's Their paintings work though jackson pollock would be

01:16

a flock of splatters And rocco would be nothing but

01:18

a solid block of color Next we'll move on to

01:21

choice b to which we say what there's Not any

01:25

reason A sane human being would put a comma after

01:28

pollock the same cat maybe but they don't have great

01:32

grammar skills All right well this brings us to option

01:34

c The correct answer The only way to cure this

01:36

sense of its grammatical issues is to cut the comma

01:38

after rothko Sorry rothko Hope you weren't attached to that 00:01:42.106 --> [endTime] Common will only hurt for a moment

Full Transcript