"Fishy accounting" or "awful close to a con job" or "Hollywood accounting" seemed like rude ways to refer to accounting practices that purposely gussy up a company's books. So the good people of the financial community came up with the euphemism "aggressive accounting."
Sometimes these steps can be illegal, or very close to illegal. In these situations, you can call it "aggressive accounting" the way you could call World War II "aggressive diplomacy." Other times, the accounting practices don't cross a moral line, but just put a company's finances in the best possible light.
The truth is that accounting seems pretty straightforward, but there is a lot of grey area. Expenses and revenues can be categorized in a lot of different ways, or the timelines of payments and revenues can be massaged to take advantage of loopholes. Like how a good lawyer can make things legal (or at least seem legal) that a bad lawyer couldn't, a good accountant can get aggressive with the books and save (or even make) a company money.
There are a couple of main reasons for aggressive accounting. A company might look to lower its tax bill, so its accountants structure things to take advantage of the fine print of the tax code. Or a company might try to make its revenue and profits look as big as possible, in order to impress shareholders or entice an acquisition offer.
Related or Semi-related Video
Finance: What's the difference between m...22 Views
Finance allah shmoop what's the difference between mergers and acquisitions
all right people listen up Merger that's what's about to
happen here it's a merger acquisition that's what's about to
happen here Corporate america is kind of same thing when
two companies merge while they generally you know attracted to
each other hopefully respect each other they share stock or
combined the stocks of each side and you know combine
efforts and then and then cuddle afterwards if they're successful
at the merger than the combination of two roughly equals
yields more than the one plus one combo that made
them so two companies get together on generally equal ish
footing In that case acquisitions are a combining more like
that eating thing on much different footing The large company
eats or buys the target either using its more highly
valued stock currency or it's taft to do so Well
why would a company acquire another Well the target might
have one hundred employees ninety of whom can be fired
with massive expense savings after the acquisition For the acquirer
such that economically the acquisition won't just makes a whole
lot of financial sense acquisitions happen for market power reasons
As well like imagine the negotiating leverage that amazon would
have if it bought the next five biggest online retailers
Or maybe it'll just kill them Probably not legal for
them to buy him anyway given the monopoly like dominance
of amazon these days But wow that would be a
powerful set of acquisitions And that would be a good
reason for ems on to acquire a whole bunch Things
and bezos would grow even more powerful maybe too powerful
Up Next
How do some accountants “cook the books”? Cooking the books refers to accountants making company’s financials look much better than they are....
What is Adverse Audit Opinion? An adverse audit opinion signals that an auditor has found flaws in a company’s financial statements. Adverse audi...
Accretive: the acquisition has a net positive impact on earnings per share. Dilutive: earnings per share are negatively impacted as a result of the...
GAAP is an acronym for Generally Accepted Accounting Practices. In order to remove as much subjectivity as possible, accounting policy bodies, such...