Let's break it down. "Indemnity" means not having a legal responsibility for something. "Anti" is the opposite of something. A "statute" is a law. So the anti-indemnity statute prevents the elimination of legal responsibility for particular parties (it feels like there's a double-negative involved there).
Generally, the anti-indemnity statute is used in the construction business. A contractor hires a subcontractor and attempts to get the subcontractor to take on any risk associated with the project, legal responsibility for things like accidents and safety. The contractor wants indemnity against being sued if something goes wrong. Anti-indemnity statutes prevent this from happening, at least to some extent. Basically, they put a limit on this indemnity and say that some legal responsibility still rests with the original contractor, whatever it says in the contract they signed with someone else. The scope of these laws vary from state to state. For instance, DC (which we know isn't technically a state, but still) doesn't have any anti-indemnity statutes on the books (as of 2016). Meanwhile, California is one of the few states that prohibits both broad and intermediate indemnity. This according to a report put out by Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer.Related or Semi-related Video
Finance: What is Contingent Liability?4 Views
Finance allah shmoop what is contingent liability All right you
know what a liability is right It's a debt it's
a promise you've made that you need to fulfill teo
pay someone and fulfilling it can be done with cash
or ah promise of delivering inventory or after you've sold
the home to the joneses An interesting family with oddly
large foreheads you know delivering good title to the home
to them right So you're fulfilling liability of producing your
home so what's a contingent liability Well think of it
is a call option or a put option on a
security A contingent liability is a derivative of some other
underlying being like another liability Well the most common contingent
liability would be a filed lawsuit that is more than
just an ambulance chasing securities lawyer hoping to get a
quick five hundred grand to go away google might be
willing to pay three billion dollars toe by ring That
wireless doorbell company started by some weirdo contingent upon ring
properly defending its lawsuit from honeywell which claims that they
own the patents on the process while the financial outcome
of that lawsuit is a contingent liability to the company
Ring and the outcome of the joneses moving into town
well is a worldwide dominance and the enslavement of all
human I mean that's what's at stake their people But 00:01:31.39 --> [endTime] not least they keep their front lawn looking nice
Up Next
What is the Securities Act of 1933? Signed by President Franklin Roosevelt, the Securities Act of 1933 was the first legislation to regulate the st...
"Safe harbor" refers to the notion that, if you follow a basic set of rules, you cannot be found guilty of a crime or shady dealings.
What is the Free Rider Problem? The free rider problem occurs when people take more than their contributed fair share of a common resource. In the...