Perfect Foresight

You step into Madame Sybil's House of Augurs and ask her about your future. She looks into her crystal ball. Suddenly, she's in a trance. She sees...she sees...long hours sitting around in pajama pants, eating the crumbs from the bottom of a Doritos bags and watching the Love Actually director's cut on a constant loop.

At first, you're skeptical. Leaving her parlor, you scoff. You figure it's all a scam. Then comes the weekend. At some point, as you brush Dorito detritus from your pajama pants and tear up at the extended version of the doorway cue-card scene, you realize...it all came true.
Madame Sybil saw the future!

That's perfect foresight. The complete, accurate knowledge of what's going to happen. Obviously, it’s not something many people have. Madame Sybil might have the gift. Or maybe (probably) she just took one look at you and made an educated guess. Generally speaking, however, perfect foresight...doesn't exist. Need evidence? Just go to a race track. Or the stock market.

But the idea of perfect foresight plays a role in some economic discussions. Economics, in real life, is complicated. To look at the total economy of a big country, like the United States, you're really looking at the day-to-day individual decisions of hundreds of millions of people. We're talking billions of small transactions, each one a complicated tangle of motivations and incentives.

Modeling that kind of thing with 100% accuracy is impossible. So to make any type of predictions about the future, economists have to make assumptions. They just have to...simplify. (Hello, Thoreau.)

Enter perfect foresight. It describes the ideal situation for an economic actor. A person with perfect foresight knows exactly what will happen when they make an economic decision: buy a car, invest in a stock, purchase the softest, most durable pajama pants they can find. Because they have perfect foresight, they will always do the thing that benefits them the most.

Making this assumption allows economists to at least determine how certain scenarios should unfold. It allows them to model economic behavior. Think of how a physicist can predict what will happen if you drop a penny off a tall building. They can take into account the distance it's falling, the gravitational constants, and stuff like air resistance. From that, they can tell you with certainty whether the penny is going to kill someone on the street if it hits them in the head.

That physicist has perfect foresight of the movement of that penny. Unfortunately, econ doesn't play out like physics. Economics deals with the decisions of people. And people are...weird.

So, as a result, econ involves all sorts of uncertainties and psychology and other quirks that make it much harder to model than a penny falling from the sky. In practice, perfect insight doesn't come into play. For most economic models, a slightly less strict assumption is made: rational expectations.

Instead of assuming people have perfect knowledge of the future, the theory of rational expectations proposes that people act on their most reasonable guesses about the future. The expectations are based on things like the current situation and their experience about what's happened in the past.

Apply this model to your trip to Madame Sybil. She didn't need perfect insight. A rational expectation about your weekend leads to the same conclusion.

Madame Sybil can take one look at you and reasonably predict that Doritos and couch potato time are in your future. Doesn't exactly take a Nostradamus to put two and two together.

Related or Semi-related Video

Econ: What is Perfect Foresight?4 Views

00:00

And finance Allah Shmoop what is perfect foresight Will you

00:07

step into Madame Symbols House of augers and you ask

00:11

her about your future She looks into her crystal ball

00:14

Suddenly she's in a trance She sees she sees long

00:18

hours sitting around in pajama pants eating the crumbs from

00:23

the bottom of a Doritos bag and watching the love

00:26

Actually director's cut on a continual loop goes four hours

00:30

All right At first you're skeptical leaving her parlor You

00:34

scoff You figure it's all a scam Then comes the

00:36

weekend Well at some point as you brushed Dorito treatise

00:41

from Europe pajama pants there and tear up the extended

00:44

version of the doorway Cue card senior Remember that you

00:48

realized it all came true Madam Sibyl saw the future

00:52

That's perfect foresight The complete accurate knowledge of what's gonna

00:57

happen Well obviously it's not something many people have Madame

01:01

Civil might have the gift Or maybe she just took

01:04

one look at you and kind of made a good

01:06

educated guess But generally speaking perfect foresight does not exist

01:10

Need evidence Well just go to a racetrack or the

01:12

stock market But the idea of perfect foresight plays a

01:16

role in some economic discussions Will economics in real life

01:19

is complicated to look at the total economy of a

01:22

big country like the United States You're really looking at

01:24

the day today individual decisions of hundreds of millions of

01:28

people were talking billions of small transactions happening all the

01:32

time Each one a complicated tangle of motivations and incentives

01:36

will modeling that kind of thing financially with one hundred

01:39

percent accuracy is impossible So to make any type of

01:42

prediction about the future economists have to make assumptions Will

01:46

economists generally have to start by simplifying Okay answer perfect

01:50

foresight It describes the ideal situation for an economic act

01:55

or a person with perfect foresight knows exactly what will

01:58

happen when they make an economic decision like buy a

02:01

car or invest in the stock or purchase the softest

02:04

most durable pajama pants They confined well because they have

02:09

perfect foresight They will always do the thing that benefits

02:12

them the most Making this assumption allows economist to at

02:14

least determine how certain scenarios should unfold It allows them

02:18

to model economic behavior Think of how a physicist can

02:21

predict what will happen if you dropped a pea Kenny

02:24

off a tall building they can take into account the

02:26

distance it's falling the gravitational constant of things like air

02:30

resistance and so on And from that well they can

02:33

tell you with certainty whether the penny is going to

02:36

kill someone on the street if it hits them square

02:38

on the head Well that physicist has perfect foresight of

02:41

the movement of that penny Thank you physics Unfortunately E

02:45

con doesn't play out like physics Economics deals with the

02:48

decisions of people and people are Yes we're just saying

02:51

weird So as a result E Con involves all sorts

02:55

of uncertainties and psychology and other quirks that make it

02:59

much harder to model in the any falling from the

03:01

sky Well in practice perfect insight doesn't come into play

03:05

For most economic models a slightly less strict assumption is

03:09

made We're going to assume rational expectations like instead of

03:13

assuming people have perfect knowledge of the future The theory

03:16

of rational expectations proposes that people act on their most

03:21

reasonable guesses about the future The expectations are based on

03:25

things like while the current situation and their experience about

03:28

what's happened in the past then apply this model to

03:31

your trip to Madame Sibyl She didn't need perfect insight

03:34

A rational expectation about your weekend leads to the same

03:37

conclusion Yeah Madame Sibyl can take one look at you

03:40

and reasonably predict that Doritos and couch potato time Our

03:44

Oh so much in your future Sorry Maybe you could 00:03:46.783 --> [endTime] get a job Something

Find other enlightening terms in Shmoop Finance Genius Bar(f)