Protectionism

This definition is brought to you by our friends at Trojan. Remember: Trojan…Protection against sleepless nights.

A Protectionist policy is one established by the local economy with the aim of financially protecting the businesses of the country.

Example:

It's Protectionist policy to charge $50 a bottle import tax against French wines being brought into California, where the local Napa wine people have a tremendous lobby, and for some strange reason, are afraid of competing mano-a-mano, or rather, bottleo-a-bottleo, with the French. Were the local Napa people confident that their wine was a better product than that of the French, then they wouldn’t bother pushing the government to have taxes against them darn foreigners, exportin’ their swill.

This process sounds rational, but in practice, the game is never so simple. For starters, many countries actively back their exporting companies in a weird kind of economic war called dumping, which has nothing to do with either country’s bathroom habits. The process of dumping usually involves high fixed costs, high sunk cost, high capitalist expenditure industries, plus the manufacture of semiconductors, such that a country with easy access to very cheap labor, cheap capital, and no regard to environmental pollution...can etch with arsenic or gallium arsenide onto silicon semiconductors at prices dramatically less than comparable builds in the United States, with the hope of either corrupting those companies, or essentially buying market share so that they become a major player around the world.

This competitive situation, then, demands all kinds of moral and ethical questions revolving around what the notion of “fair” means...when it’s not about love or war.

The same friction gets laid in a Protectionist policy, where, rather than imposing taxes or import duties from foreign distributors, local countries place a quota on the quantity or volume of product allowed into the country from that interloper. At the extreme end, a complete embargo blocks all importing of that good. Strategically, politicians aim protectionist policies at domestic industry jobs because, in essence, in the short-run, each good sold to a foreign distributor exporting their product into the U.S. takes away at least some value of a domestic equivalent product.

Additionally, balance of trade becomes an issue. If the U.S. could import 100% of everything it uses, at half the price at which it manufactures it locally, life would be grand for Americans living large on the Macy’s White Flower Day Half-Off Sale for about two quarters, or half a year. After that, our existing industries would essentially evaporate as meaningful economic entities, and with no revenues coming to them from sales, there would be little money to send across our borders to buy things like oil and Japanese trucks and wind-powered jetpacks.

Adding yet more complexity to the notion of protectionism, this black and white picture of importing and/or exporting 100% of any given good is usually incomplete. That is, Mercedes makes its engines in Germany, but stamps its bodies in the U.S., while using tires from Korea, France, and Japan. And windshield wipers and other accessories from other manufacturers in non-union red states in America. They’re all assembled in North Carolina. So how do you even begin to calculate what a Protectionist policy would do in this very cloudy, vague sense of who owns what and where, and how much protectionist policy would do to help or harm the global balance of power?

The broader notion here is that the world receives a “peace dividend” when companies are not at war in this unhealthy way. Consumers benefit when companies simply compete to deliver higher and higher quality product for incrementally better value to the end user. If Protectionism gets in the way of that liquid flow of Darwinian economic competition, it just adds friction where it isn’t needed.

Related or Semi-related Video

Finance: What is Protectionist?5 Views

00:00

Finance Allah Shmoop What is protectionist This video is brought

00:08

to you by our friends at Trojan Remember Trojan protection

00:11

against sleepless nights A protectionist policy and essence tries to

00:16

financially proto checked the businesses of the country while a

00:20

protectionist policies one established by the local economy or country

00:24

with the aim of financially protecting the businesses with in

00:28

that country Example it is protectionist policy to charge fifty

00:34

dollars a bottle import tax against French wines being imported

00:39

into California where local Napa wine people have a tremendous

00:43

lobby and for some strange reason are afraid of competing

00:46

mano a mano or a rather bottle Oh bottle o

00:50

We're local Napa people confident that their wine was a

00:53

better product than that of the French Then they wouldn't

00:56

bother pushing the government tohave taxes against them Damn foreigners

01:00

exporting their swill Well this process sounds rational but in

01:03

practice the game is oh so never simple For starters

01:06

many countries actively back They're exporting companies in a weird

01:10

kind of economic war called dumping which has nothing to

01:13

do with either countries Bathroom habits The process of dumping

01:16

usually involves high fixed costs high sunk costs in high

01:20

capital expenditure industries Plus well then there's the manufacture of

01:25

semiconductors Yeah such that a country with easy access to

01:28

very cheap labor cheap capital and no regard to environmental

01:31

pollution Well they can match with arsenic or gallium arsenide

01:35

Onda silicon semiconductors at prices dramatically less than comparable builds

01:40

in the United States with the hope of either corrupting

01:43

those companies are essentially buying market share so that they

01:46

become a major player around the world Will the competitive

01:49

situation then demands all kinds of moral and ethical questions

01:53

revolving around what the notion of quote fair unquote trade

01:56

means Like you know when it's not about love and

01:59

war Well the same friction gets laid in a protectionist

02:02

policy where rather than imposing taxes are import duties from

02:06

foreign distributors local countries place a quota on the quantity

02:10

or volume of product allowed into the country From that

02:13

interloper at the extreme end there's a complete embargo blocking

02:17

all importing of that good strategically politicians aim protectionist policies

02:23

domestic industries because in essence in the short run each

02:27

goods sold to a foreign distributor exporting their products into

02:31

the U S Takes away some value from a domestic

02:35

taxpaying producer Right So if we bought all our cars

02:38

from Japanese and Korean producers and bought none of them

02:41

from American producers well all our dough would be shit

02:45

doubt overseas right Well Additionally balance of trade then becomes

02:48

an issue If the U S Could import a hundred

02:49

percent of everything it uses at half the price at

02:52

which it manufacturers that locally well life would be grand

02:55

for Americans living large on the Macy's White Flower Day

02:58

half off sale for about two quarters or a male

03:00

maybe half a year right Think about it If you

03:03

could buy that gap shirt instead of paying forty eight

03:06

dollars for the rugby style thing you could buy it

03:08

for twenty four dollars for the exact same shirt Well

03:11

why wouldn't you after that our existing industries would essentially

03:15

evaporate is meaningful economic entities and with no revenues coming

03:19

to them from sales Well there'd be little money to

03:21

send across our borders to buy things like oil and

03:24

Japanese trucks Okay well adding yet more complexity to the

03:27

notion of protectionism This black and white picture of importing

03:30

and exporting one hundred percent of any given good is

03:32

usually incomplete That is Mercedes makes its engines in Germany

03:36

but stamps its bodies in the U S While using

03:39

tires from Korea France and Japan and windshield wipers and

03:43

other accessories from other manufacturers in nonunion red states in

03:47

America and from Latin America They're all assembled in North

03:50

Carolina So how do you even begin to calculate what

03:53

a protectionist policy would do in this very cloudy vague

03:57

sense of who owns what who benefits from what where

04:00

and how much protectionist policy would do to help her

04:03

harm the global balance the power The broader goal here

04:05

and general notion is that the world receives a quote

04:07

peace dividend unquote when company's heir not at war in

04:11

this unhealthy way consumer's benefit when companies simply compete to

04:15

deliver higher and higher quality product for incrementally better value

04:18

to the end user If protectionism gets in the way

04:20

of that liquid flow of Darwinian economic competition well it

04:23

just adds friction where it really isn't needed And it's

04:26

simply inefficient So to recap protectionism stopping the flow bad

04:31

but the's thing stopping the flow good

Find other enlightening terms in Shmoop Finance Genius Bar(f)