Reasonableness Standard

  

Categories: Financial Theory

Was it reasonable for you to take the 87-year-old heiress' inheritance and invest it all in venture capital funds?

She had $8 million to her name; you put $7 million in VC. So let's think about this. Was it reasonable? Was it reasonable, given that the heiress had life expectancy of 89? So she had, like...two years left. And you put her into funds that don't really even begin to pay back cash or stock (like post-IPO or sale) distributions for at least 5 years?

Answer: no. Not at all. It was not even remotely reasonable. Total bonehead move on your end. You'd get sued for misfeasance. And lose.

There is a generic reasonableness standard that's just...out there. Peer review usually determines its dotted line edges and defines "reasonable."

Related or Semi-related Video

Finance: What does it mean to have fiduc...51 Views

00:00

Finance a la Shmoop! What does it mean to have fiduciary obligation? Alright well

00:09

fiduciary refers to the responsible person, who has oversight, above a given

00:15

financial transaction, or process. That is, it is the fiduciary obligation, of the

00:21

head of a corporation's Audit Committee, to be certain that the

00:25

accounting process is handled fairly, objectively, inclusively and thoroughly [boss overseeing worker]

00:29

and there are a few other ly's in there, but well you get the gist. Doesn't it

00:34

seem strange, that some companies just seem to get into the same kind of

00:39

trouble again and again. Remember the BP oil spill, well it wasn't the first time

00:45

they'd had, an accident. You know, if you can call that spill only an accident.

00:49

What kind of oversight did they have? Any? Well some companies just have a [man carrying oil barrel

00:54

corporate culture that's run by the notion, that well, whatever isn't caught

00:58

as a crime, is legal. Lots of Wall Street stock brokerages came and went this

01:03

way. Yah, remember the Wolf of Wall Street? Kind of like that. Well what is

01:06

the obligation of a responsible party when faced with ethical dilemmas? Where

01:11

does the obligation start and stop? Should fiduciaries be held to a higher

01:15

personal standard than normal people? Yah, kind of the, you know, Harvey

01:20

Weinstein effect there. Yes, No, maybe, alright. Right, all three times. [question ABCD chart]

01:24

It's definitely yes, no, or maybe.

Up Next

Finance: What are Prudent Investor Rule Standards, the Know Your Client Rule and Unsuitable Recommendations?
7 Views

What are Prudent Investor Rule Standards, the Know Your Client Rule, and unsuitable recommendations?

Find other enlightening terms in Shmoop Finance Genius Bar(f)