Union

Categories: Company Management

Union workers exist because workers were abused at different points in our country’s history. Ever read The Grapes of Wrath? Joad family. Peach-picking for like 5 bucks a day. Well, you should if you haven't. And then there’s Norma Rae. Union in the cotton fabric mill.

So yes, unions exist in reaction to bad acting on the part of The Man, and they collectively bargain against The Man on behalf of the workers who belong. And they make the country a whole lot more fair and square.

Corporations frequently don't want to deal with unions. They dictated salaries and benefits as they saw fit. And then unions got uppity. Corporations got...downity. And the result was that a whole bunch of unionized shops were forced to hire a lot more workers than they really needed. And the work rules that originally were intended to protect...made it hard to train and fire. Really talented people did not want to be paid like the average Joe with the same career path. But really untalented, lazy people loved the fact that it was hard to get fired. Ever been to the DMV? Through the TSA? Yeah, that's what we're talkin' 'bout.

Talk to a now-bankrupt newspaper company who couldn’t downsize fast enough to accommodate the assault of the lower margin internet-delivered competitors. Union rules wouldn't let them fire workers fast enough. And the industry revenue model changed. NPs couldn’t absorb cost changes fast enough. So they all went bankrupt. And everyone ended up being out of work.

Then there's the largest union in the country: the U.S. Government. Yep, our own G-Men have the largest set of union workers in the country, and they cost taxpayers a fortune. They can almost never be fired, they have spectacularly expensive benefits, and the real salaries (if you do fair math) are very high. Taxpayers pay for government unions. Often the union worker has a better deal than the taxpayer who supports him/her. Yet taxpayers keep voting in raises and benefits and all kinds of rules that let the government hire 37 people for jobs that only need 14.

Example time:

A police officer works 30 years on the force, from age 22 to 52.

She can then retire and make 85% of what her average pay was for her last three years. And, of course, in those last three years, she does massive overtime and extra work to goose up her eventual $175k-a-year pay. She then is retired. But for the remaining 30 years she’ll live, she get 175 grand a year. So she might claim she "only" made $175k...but, in fact, for the 30 years she worked, she cost taxpayers something like double that amount. Plus benefits.

So it isn't that Joe Taxpayer doesnt believe the officer has worked really hard. The question remains: does that person deserve a much better retirement system than the taxpayers funding her? Hm...the jury’s still out.

Related or Semi-related Video

Finance: Who benefits from unions?11 Views

00:00

Finance allah shmoop who benefits from unions And while union

00:07

workers duh Maybe a better question is who doesn't benefit

00:11

from unions Well okay okay Union workers exist because workers

00:16

were abused at different points in our country's history Ever

00:20

read the grapes of wrath Yeah Joad family Peach picking

00:23

for like five bucks a day or less And then

00:26

there's norma rae great film should see it won the

00:28

academy award and remember the speech You love me You

00:31

love me That union in a cotton fabric mill lots

00:36

of abuse there So yes unions exist in reaction to

00:39

bad acting on the part of the man and they

00:42

collectively bargain against the man on behalf of the workers

00:47

who belong And they made the country a whole lot

00:50

more fair and square So thankyou unions for that Historically

00:53

well guess what time moved forward and corporations today frequently

00:58

don't want to deal with unions They dictated salaries and

01:01

benefits as they saw fit and well the workers pushed

01:05

back Union's got uppity and then corporations got down ity

01:10

all right And the result was that all whole bunch

01:12

of unionized shops were forced to hire a lot more

01:15

Workers than they really needed That is that the man

01:19

was required to hire thirty seven people instead of the

01:21

twenty three he actually needed And the work rules that

01:24

originally were intended to protect made it hard to train

01:28

and to fire like really talented people did not want

01:31

to be paid like the average joe with the same

01:33

career path But really untalented people loved the fact that

01:37

it was hard to get fired inside of a union

01:39

So you got all kinds conflict inside of the union

01:42

as well Got it And you know the firing thing

01:45

ever been to a d m v car place that

01:47

we get your license Wake up They're still all right

01:50

Well let's Talk to a now bankrupt newspaper company who

01:53

couldn't downsized fast enough to accommodate the assault of the

01:57

lower margin internet delivered competitors Local newspapers were highly unionized

02:02

at the time in the nineties and union rules would

02:04

not let them fire workers fast enough And then the

02:08

industry revenue model changed really fast Newspapers could not absorb

02:12

the cost changes fast enough They couldn't fire people So

02:16

they all went bankrupt And then all the workers were

02:19

out of jobs and everyone ended up being out of

02:21

work Yeah well that was a fail on the unions

02:23

part They didn't move quick enough So who doesn't benefit

02:26

from unions Well the largest union in the country the

02:30

u s government Our own g men have the largest

02:33

set of union workers in the country and they cost

02:36

taxpayers of fortune They can almost never be fired They

02:40

have spectacularly expensive benefits and the real salaries If you

02:44

do fair math are actually very high Taxpayers pay for

02:48

government unions Often the union worker has a way better

02:52

deal than the taxpayer him or herself who supports that

02:55

union worker Yet taxpayers keep voting in raises and benefits

02:59

and all kinds of rules that let the government higher

03:02

Thirty seven people for jobs that really only need fourteen

03:05

We can't figure out the rationale there either maybe the

03:08

taxpayer someday you'll wise up Police officer works thirty years

03:16

on the force from age twenty two Two fifty two

03:19

not darth vader Kind different force She can then retire

03:22

and make eighty five percent of what her average pay

03:25

wass for her last three years And of course in

03:29

those last three years she does massive overtime and extra

03:32

work toe goose up her eventual hundred seventy five grand

03:35

a year Pay Ask your folks how they feel about

03:38

a cop making one hundred seventy five grand in a

03:40

year All right well she then retires but for the

03:43

remaining thirty years that she'll live she'll get one hundred

03:46

seventy five grand a year That's her pension that's what

03:49

cops get in california Welcome to the left state here

03:53

So she might claim that she quote on ly unquote

03:56

made one hundred seventy five grand We think that's a

03:59

lot for cops getting cats out of trees But in

04:01

fact for the thirty years she worked she actually cost

04:04

the taxpayers something like double that amount plus benefits So

04:08

it isn't that joe taxpayer doesn't believe the officer has

04:12

worked really hard The question remains Does that person deserve

04:16

so much better pay And retirement and benefits and all

04:20

the other stuff then joe taxpayer who's funding her well

04:24

Police have a great union and jury's still out on

04:26

a lot of these questions But you know what they

04:28

say It's the government office who writes all the checks

04:31

Unions can't live with them Yeah that's it We're done 00:04:34.238 --> [endTime] that that's where they stopped the conversation

Find other enlightening terms in Shmoop Finance Genius Bar(f)