All the Pretty Horses Fate and Free Will Quotes

How we cite our quotes: (Paragraph)

Quote #1

When the wind was in the north you could hear them [the Comanches], the horses and the breath of the horses and the horses' hooves that were shod in rawhide and the rattle of lances and the constant drag of the travois poles in the sand like the passing of some enormous serpent and the young boys naked on wild horses jaunty as circus riders and hazing wild horses before them and the dogs trotting with their tongues aloll and foot-slaves following half naked and sorely burdened and above all the low chant of their traveling song which the riders sand as they rode, nation and ghost of nation passing in a soft chorale across that mineral waste to darkness bearing lost to all history and all remembrance like a grail the sum of their secular and transitory and violent lives. (18)

Compare this scene, describing the vanishing ghosts of Native Americans, to the Native Americans that watch as John vanishes into the landscape at the end of the novel. Does the novel suggest that everyone simply disappears? Or is there something left behind? What might that be (besides dirty laundry and Twinkies)?

Quote #2

His grandfather was the oldest of eight boys and the only one to live past the age of twenty-five. They were drowned, shot, kicked by horses. They perished in fires. They seemed to fear only dying in bed. The last two were killed in Puerto Rico in eighteen ninety-eight and in that year he married and brought his bride home to the ranch and he must have walked out and stood looking at his holdings and reflected long upon the ways of God and the laws of primogeniture. Twelve years later when his wife was carried off in the influenza epidemic they still had no children. A year later he married his dead wife's older sister and a year after this the boy's mother was born and that was all the borning that there was. The Grady name was buried with that old man the day the norther blew the lawnchairs over the dead cemetery grass. (25)

This passage about death, violence, and family lines follows right after Quote #1 on the disappearance of the Comanches. What parallels or differences do you see?

Quote #3

The lawyer stood.

Some things in this world cant be helped, he said. And I believe this is probably one of em.

Yeah, the boy said. (228-30)

John makes a last-ditch effort with his mother's lawyer to maintain control over the ranch, and the scene closes with this statement of futility. Is this John's main reason for leaving Texas? What other motivating factors can you think of? Does he really not have a choice?

Quote #4

They heard somewhere in that tenantless night a bell that tolled and ceased where no bell was and they rode out on the round dais of the earth which alone was dark and no light to it and which carried their figures and bore them up into the swarming stars so that they rode not under but among them and they rode at once jaunty and circumspect, like young thieves in a glowing orchard, loosely jacketed against the cold and ten thousand words for the choosing. (429)

Do you think that this sense of freedom, suggested by this early passage as Rawlins and John Grady ride off toward Mexico, continues throughout the novel? How does it change, and in what ways?

Quote #5

Ever dumb thing I ever done in my life there was a dumb decision I made before that got me into it. It was never the dumb thing. It was always some choice I'd made before it. (1157)

Rawlins makes this argument to justify leaving Blevins behind, and his instinct turns out to be right. (Pro tip: always listen to the prescient complaining sidekick.) What might the novel be trying to say here—do we always have a choice? Are certain choices predetermined by other choices, or possibly by something else?

Quote #6

You ever think about dyin?

Yeah. Some. You?

Yeah. Some. You think there's a heaven?

Yeah. Dont you?

I dont know. Yeah. Maybe. You think you can believe in heaven if you dont believe in hell?

I guess you can believe what you want to.

Rawlins nodded. You think about all the stuff that can happen to you, he said. There aint no end to it.

You fixin to get religion on us?

No. Just sometimes I wonder if I wouldnt be better off if I did. (1391-9)

This quote, coming when John and Rawlins are on the run for abetting Blevins, shows Rawlins wondering about the afterlife. The element of choice here—you can believe in religion or not, or whatever you want—seems to take away the very significance of belief at first.

Quote #7

Finally John Grady asked him if it were not true that should all horses vanish from the face of the earth the soul of the horse would not also perish for there would be nothing out of which to replenish it but the old man only said that it was pointless to speak of there being no horses in the world for God would not permit such a thing. (1645)

The old veteran Luis contrasts the communal soul of horses with the separation between human beings, ascribing a kind of eternal quality to the soul of a horse and its identity. Luis' refusal to even consider there being no horses seems telling—what kind of a worldview does it suggest? How might that be different from the world of humans, or the relativism of belief suggested by John Grady above?

Quote #8

[John Grady] claimed that cowsense could be bred for. The hacendado was less sure. But there were two things they agreed upon wholly and that were never spoken and that was that God had put horses on earth to work cattle and that other than cattle there was no wealth proper to a man. (1862)

Solid career advice: quit school and get yourself to a ranch ASAP.

Quote #9

I thought you didnt believe in fate.

She waved her hand. It's not so much that I dont believe in it. I dont subscribe to its nomination. If fate is the law then is fate also subject to that law? At some point we cannot escape naming responsibility. It's in our nature. Sometimes I think we are all like that myopic coiner at his press, taking the blind slugs one by one from the tray, all of us bent so jealously at our work, determined that not even chaos be outside of our own making. (3436-7)

What might Alfonsa mean by fate being subject to its own laws—is there a cause-and-effect relationship there? Or is it more like an unresolvable paradox? Why?

Quote #10

He stood hat in hand over the unmarked earth. This woman who had worked for his family fifty years. She had cared for his mother as a baby and she had worked for his family long before his mother was born and she had known and cared for the wild Grady boys who were his mother's uncles and who had all died so long ago and he stood holding his hat and turned his wet face to the wind and for a moment he held out his hands as if to steady himself or as if to bless the ground there or perhaps to slow the world that was rushing away and seemed to care nothing for the old or the young or rich or poor or dark or pale or he or she. Nothing for their struggles, nothing for their names. Nothing for the living or the dead. (4049)

The impersonal nature of the way the world views all of us is here laid out in its most explicit form in the novel. Even if you managed to get through the end of that quote without being overwhelmed by existential despair and futility, we still recommend you go buy a cupcake or something.