Miranda v. Arizona: White Dissent: Subsection II Summary

  • Like Harlan, White says that the new ruling is "at odds with American and English legal history," and is a "departure from a long line of precedent" (WhiteDissent.II.1).
  • White rambles on for a bit about justice, and finishes this very short subsection by saying that the Supreme Court should not make new laws "based on speculation alone" (WhiteDissent.II.2).