Death in Venice Literature and Writing Quotes

How we cite our quotes: (Chapter.Paragraph)

Quote #1

Overwrought from the difficult and dangerous labors of the late morning hours, labors demanding the utmost caution, prudence, tenacity, and precision of will, the writer had even after the midday meal been unable to halt the momentum of the inner mechanism—the motus animi continuus in which, according to Cicero, eloquence resides—and find the refreshing sleep that the growing wear and tear upon his forces had made a daily necessity. And so, shortly after tea he had sought the outdoors in the hope that open air and exercise might revive him and help him to enjoy a fruitful evening. (1.1)

In the very first paragraph of Death in Venice, we read this description of Aschenbach as a writer whose "labors" require "caution, prudence, tenacity, and precision of will." As we discuss in the "Characters" section, this description comes with an ironic edge; the way this passage goes to lengths to portray Aschenbach's writing as a heroic feat gives us the sense that he probably takes himself too seriously.

Quote #2

Yet he knew only too well the source of the sudden temptation. It was an urge to flee—he fully admitted it, this yearning for freedom, release, oblivion—an urge to flee his work, the humdrum routine of a rigid, cold, passionate duty. Granted, he loved that duty and even almost loved the enervating daily struggle between his proud, tenacious, much-tested will and the growing fatigue, which no one must suspect or the finished product betray by the slightest sign of foundering or neglect. But it made sense not to go too far in the other direction, not to be so obstinate as to curb a need erupting with such virulence. (1.8)

Let's face it: Everyone gets writer's block. It's important to keep in mind that Aschenbach's desire to see exotic places only arises because he's hit a rough spot in his writing. The narrator describes his longing to travel as "an urge to flee" his writer's block.

Quote #3

At forty, at fifty, and even when younger, at an age when others dissipate their talents, wax rhapsodic, or blissfully defer their grand projects, he would start his day early by dashing cold water over his chest and back; then, having set a pair of tall wax candles in silver holders at the head of his manuscript, he would spend two or three fervent, conscientious hours offering up to art the strength he had garnered in sleep. It was a forgivable error—indeed, it betokened a victory for his moral stance—that the uninitiated should take the world of his Maya or the epic background against which Frederick's feats unfolded as the product of prodigious strength and unending stamina, but in fact they grew out of daily increments of hundreds upon hundreds of bits of inspiration, and the only reason they were so perfect—overall and in every detail—was that their creator had held out for years under the strain of a single work with a fortitude and tenacity analogous to those Frederick had used to conquer his native province, and that he had devoted only his most vibrant and vital hours to its composition. (2.5)

Now that's what we call discipline. In this passage, the narrator shows us Aschenbach as an uncompromising artist whose success is based not in a heroic feat of "prodigious strength," but rather in a commitment to "daily increments" of unending labor. Here, we have the quintessential depiction of Aschenbach as a disciplined writer, who sees writing as a kind of holy duty—well, we know where that ends up.

Quote #4

What one saw when one looked into the world as narrated by Aschenbach was elegant self-possession concealing inner dissolution and biological decay from the eyes of the world until the eleventh hour; a sallow, sensually destitute ugliness capable of fanning its smoldering lust into a pure flame, indeed, of rising to sovereignty in the realm of beauty; pallid impotence probing the incandescent depths of the mind for the strength to cast an entire supercilious people at the foot of the Cross, at their feet; an obliging manner in the empty, punctilious service of form; the life, false and dangerous, and the swiftly enervating desires and art of the born deceiver. Observing all this and much more of a like nature, one might well wonder whether the only possible heroism was the heroism of the weak. Yet what heroism was more at one with the times? (2.7)

The narrator takes us into the fictional world created by Aschenbach in order to make a comment on Aschenbach's own fate. How's that for a clever trick? The image of "elegant self-possession concealing inner dissolution and biological decay" sounds like a fitting summary of Aschenbach in Death and Venice, suggesting that writers often write themselves in their own characters.

Quote #5

"I shall stay, then," Aschenbach thought. "What better place could there be?" And folding his hands in his lap, he let his eyes run over the sea's great expanse and set his gaze adrift till it blurred and broke in the monotonous mist of barren space. He loved the sea and for deep-seated reasons: the hardworking artist's need for repose, the desire to take shelter from the demanding diversity of phenomena in the bosom of boundless simplicity, a propensity—proscribed and diametrically opposed to his mission in life and for that very reason seductive—a propensity for the unarticulated, the immoderate, the eternal, for nothingness. To repose in perfection is the desire of all those who strive for excellence, and is not nothingness a form of perfection? (3.54)

Here's a classic turning point: When Aschenbach decides to stay in Venice, after an attempt to leave, we see him being pulled in by the "seductive" possibility of "the unarticulated, the immoderate, the eternal, […] nothingness," a.k.a. the opposite of everything he cares about: writing (articulation) and disciplined work to produce something.

Quote #6

What discipline, what precision of thought was conveyed by that tall, youthfully perfect physique! Yet the austere and pure will laboring in obscurity to bring the godlike statue to light—was it not known to him, familiar to him as an artist? Was it not at work in him when, chiseling with sober passion at the marble block of language, he released the slender form he had beheld in his mind and world present to the world as an effigy and mirror of spiritual beauty? (4.7)

Sounds like someone has God issues… What Aschenbach first admires in Tadzio is not so much a human being, but rather the "precision of thought" he sees revealed in the boy's "perfect physique." He admires and identifies with the "austere and pure will" that has produced Tadzio. Not surprisingly, Aschenbach will not long after this imagine Socrates telling Phaedrus that "the lover is more divine than the beloved"—the lover, in this case, Aschenbach, loves and sees himself in the divine force that has created the beloved (4.9). Maybe that's why he calls Tadzio a "mirror."

Quote #7

Nothing gladdens a writer more than a thought that can become pure feeling and a feeling that can become pure thought. Just such a pulsating thought, just such a precise feeling was then in the possession and service of the solitary traveler: nature trembles with bliss when the mind bows in homage to beauty. He suddenly desired to write. Eros, we are told, loves indolence, and for indolence was he created. But as this point in his crisis the stricken man was aroused to production. The stimulus scarcely mattered. A query, a challenge to make one's views known on a certain major, burning issue of taste and culture had gone out to eh intellectual world and caught up with him on his travels. It was something he was familiar with, something he knew from experience, and the desire to make it shine in the light of his words was suddenly irresistible. (4.10)

If Aschenbach travels to escape his writer's block, then Tadzio is his cure. Here, "Eros," the stirring of Aschenbach's erotic feelings for Tadzio, is put in the position of a source of inspiration. The desire to make his idea "shine in the light of his words" is aligned here with a sexual desire—Aschenbach's longing for Tadzio as a symbol of pure beauty.

Quote #8

What is more, he longed to work in Tadzio's presence, to model his writing on the boy's physique, to let his style follow the lines of that body, which he saw as godlike, and bear it beauty to the realm of the intellect, as the eagle had once borne the Trojan shepherd to the ether. Never had he experienced the pleasure of the word to be sweeter, never had he known with such certitude that Eros is in the word than during those dangerously delightful hours when, seated at his rough table under the awning, in full view of his idol, the music of his voice in his ears, he formulated that little essay—a page and a half of sublime prose based on Tadzio's beauty—the purity, nobility, and quivering emotion tension of which would soon win the admiration of many. (4.10)

Tadzio not only inspires Aschenbach to write; Aschenbach does write, and the "page and a half" he writes about Tadzio's beauty "would soon win the admiration of many." At this point in Death in Venice, Aschenbach reaches the high point of his creative potential, when he realizes that "Eros is in the word"—the idea that creativity has something to do with eroticism. But "Eros" can also be dangerous…

Quote #9

It is surely as well that the world knows only a beautiful work itself and not its origins, the conditions under which it comes into being, for if people had knowledge of the sources from which the artist derives his inspiration they would oftentimes be confused and alarmed and thus vitiate the effects the artist had achieved. How strange those hours were! How oddly enervating the effort! How curiously fruitful the intercourse of mind with body! When Aschenbach put away his work and quit the beach, he felt exhausted and, yes, spent, as if his conscience were reproaching him after a debauch. (4.10)

When it comes to writing, this passage informs us, some things are better left unsaid. People prefer to imagine writing as a task that has nothing to do with illicit passion. But, as it turns out, that's just what Death and Venice goes and shows us. Death in Venice is kind of like a behind-the-scenes version of literature.

Quote #10

There he sat, the master, the eminently dignified artist, the author of "A Wretched Figure," who had rejected bohemian excess and the murky depths in a form of exemplary purity, who had renounced all sympathy for the abyss and reprehended the reprehensible, climbed the heights, and, having transcended his erudition and outgrown all irony, accepted the obligations that come with mass approbation, a man whose fame was official, whose name had been made noble, and whose style schoolboys were exhorted to emulate—there he sat, his eyes closed, with only an occasional, rapidly disappearing sidelong glance, scornful and sheepish, slipping out from under them and a few isolated words issuing from his slack, cosmetically embellished lips, the result of the curious dream logic of his half-slumbering brain. (5.50)

How's that for irony? Aschenbach, who's famous for writing a story called "A Wretched Figure," himself ends his life in a pretty wretched position. Even though he has attained literary greatness through discipline and by renouncing "sympathy for the abyss" and by having "outgrown all irony," he—ironically, of course—ends up giving it all away for Tadzio, becoming exactly the kind of character that he has struggled to portray in his own writing.