How we cite our quotes: (Chapter.Paragraph)
Quote #1
The definition of a "beast" has caused controversy for centuries. Though this might surprise some first-time students of Magizoology, the problem might come into clearer focus if we take a moment to consider three types of magical creature.
Werewolves spend most of their time as humans (whether wizard or Muggle). Once a month, however, they transform into savage, four-legged beasts of murderous intent and no human conscience.
The centaurs' habits are not humanlike; they live in the wild, refuse clothing, prefer to live apart from wizards and Muggles alike, and yet have intelligence equal to theirs.
Trolls bear a humanoid appearance, walk upright, may be taught a few simple words, and yet are less intelligent than the dullest unicorn, and possess no magical powers in their own right except for their prodigious and unnatural strength.
We now ask ourselves: which of these creatures is a "being" – that is to say, a creature worthy of legal rights and a voice in the governance of the magical world – and which is a "beast"? (4.1-5)
Well, this puts the problem of identity in perspective, doesn't it? Who's a being and who is a beast? And who exactly gets to make those decisions? Wow. This is gonna be tougher than we thought.
Quote #2
As we see, the mere possession of two legs was no guarantee that a magical creature could or would take an interest in the affairs of wizard government […]
Muldoon's successor, Madame Elfrida Clagg, attempted to redefine "beings" in the hope of creating closer ties with other magical creatures. "Beings," she declared, were those who could speak the human tongue. All those who could make themselves understood to Council members were therefore invited to join the next meeting. Once again, however, there were problems. (4.8-9)
Okay, so the magical community first attempts to define beings as anything that walks on two legs. That doesn't work out too well. Then, they decide that anyone who can communicate with humans can be called a being. Again, it's a problem. Are these superficial characteristic really the best way to define a whole identity?
Quote #3
Not until 1811 were definitions found that most of the magical community found acceptable. Grogan Stump, the newly appointed Minister for Magic, decreed that a "being" was "any creature that has sufficient intelligence to understand the laws of the magical community and to bear part of the responsibility in shaping those laws." (4.10)
So this is closer to a true identity. This is based on what's in your mind instead of the way you look. Is this the same way Muggles think about identity? You are what you think you are?
Quote #4
Naturally, the matter has not rested there. We are all familiar with the extremists who campaign for the classification of Muggles as "beasts"; we are all aware that the centaurs have refused "being" status and requested to remain "beasts"; werewolves, meanwhile, have been shunted between the Beast and Being divisions for many years; at the time of writing there is an office for Werewolf Support Services at the Being Division whereas the Werewolf Registry and Werewolf Capture Unit fall under the Beast Division. Several highly intelligent creatures are classified as "beasts" because they are incapable of overcoming their own brutal natures. Acromantulas and Manticores are capable of intelligent speech but will attempt to devour any human that goes near them. The sphinx talks only in puzzles and riddles, and is violent when given the wrong answer. (4.11)
All right, so this whole identity thing is pretty complicated… and it should be. We're talking about creatures who don't neatly fit into categories. Hey, does that sound like any Muggles you might know?
Quote #5
The centaurs objected to some of the creatures with whom they were asked to share "being" status, such as hags and vampires, and declared that they would manage their own affairs separately from wizards. A year later the merpeople made the same request. The Ministry of Magic accepted their demands reluctantly. (4.11)
Wizards probably think that most folks would want to be beings if they could be, but the centaurs and merpeople prove them wrong. They'd rather be in the category seen as "lesser." They'll take care of their own affairs, thank you very much.
Quote #6
Merpeople exist throughout the world, though they vary in appearance almost as much as humans. Their habits and customs remain as mysterious as those of the centaur, though those wizards who have mastered the language of Mermish speak of highly organised communities varying in size according to habitat, and some have elaborately constructed dwellings. Like the centaurs, the merpeople have declined "being" status in favour of a "beast" classification. (21.4)
So, merpeople should really be in the beings category, but they reject that label. They'll just go on by themselves, like the centaurs and make their own lives. Sounds like they're doing fine without the other beings out there.
Quote #7
In retaliation, so the story has it, a gang of McCliverts surrounded the MacBoon dwellings one night and Transfigured each and every MacBoon into a monstrous five- legged creature. The McCliverts realised too late that the Transfigured MacBoons were infinitely more dangerous in this state (the MacBoons had the reputation for great ineptitude at magic). Moreover, the MacBoons resisted every attempt to turn them back into human form. The monsters killed every last one of the McCliverts until no human remained on the island. It was only then that the MacBoon monsters realised that in the absence of anyone to wield a wand, they would be forced to remain as they were forevermore. (25.2)
This story raises a pretty interesting question about the Quintapeds—are they beings or beasts? If they were once wizards, shouldn't they really be classified as beings? Or does the fact that they're now violent and unpredictable mean that they're just beasts forever and always? The world may never know.
Quote #8
Trolls generally converse in grunts that appear to constitute a crude language, though some have been known to understand and even to speak a few simple human words. The more intelligent of the species have been trained as guardians. (28.3)
Trolls very nearly made it into beings status…except for the fact that they're really stupid and can't understand anything about magical laws. That's a strike against them. If everyone had held to the old standard of just being able to speak, wizards would be forced to deal with trolls running around at every single meeting.
Quote #9
This classification refers, of course, to the werewolf in its transformed state. When there is no full moon, the werewolf is as harmless as any other human. For a heartrending account of one wizard's battle with lycanthropy, see the classic Hairy Snout, Human Heart by an anonymous author. (30.1)
Poor werewolves. These guys are forever doomed to have two identities—one of which they definitely don't want. After all, who'd want to be an uncontrollable beast part of the time? Well, who except Fenrir Greyback.