Study Guide

Chinese Exclusion Act Themes

By Chester A. Arthur

Advertisement - Guide continues below

  • Fear

    In a lot of ways, fear is the primary motivator behind the Chinese Exclusion Act. Not just the fear you might be thinking of: spiders. (Because who's not scared of spiders?)

    But not even xenophobia comes from an exclusively racist place.

    Remember that the Chinese Exclusion Act partially came out of the Panic of 1873. "Panic" is a specific kind of fear. It's not the controlled kind that heroes get where they're running from dinosaurs. That kind of fear is rational. They can do stuff that makes sense, like shooting the dinosaurs, locking doors behind them, and regretting cloning dinosaurs in the first place. Panic means flailing and screaming.

    You're doing dumb stuff, like excluding the Chinese from the country.

    Questions About Fear

    1. How much of the fear motivating the Chinese Exclusion Act was based on racism and how much on economic conditions? If the end result is the same, does it matter?
    2. Has fear ever resulted in a positive outcome politically? If so, when? If not, why does it remain one of the driving forces in politics?
    3. What is the difference between fear and hatred with regards to the Chinese Exclusion Act? Is there a difference?
    4. How can the fear expressed in the Chinese Exclusion Act be a blueprint for modern political struggles? What does it show you? What can you learn?

    Chew on This

    The Chinese Exclusion Act was born from the fear of economic collapse, and though it was targeted at a specific ethnicity, this was a political reality, as business interests were not going to be regulated.

    The Chinese Exclusion Act was born from a fear of a very different culture and ethnicity. Though it used economics as a flimsy justification, it is fundamentally about race.

  • Race

    Despite the name, the Chinese Exclusion Act isn't entirely about race. There's a lot going on here, from an economic, political, and even practical standpoint. It's a complex issue, motivated by many all-too-understandable human foibles.

    But come on, it's the Chinese Exclusion Act. It's not all about race, but you'd have to have both eyes closed and be humming at top volume to think race had nothing to do with it. The Chinese were a source of cheap labor, and they came from a very different culture than was prevalent in the United States at the time.

    In this modern era, we know people of Chinese descent as our neighbors, our family, and our friends. The people in 1882 didn't know them like that yet.

    Questions About Race

    1. Did it matter that the race in question was the Chinese? Would this have happened to any other country of origin, had they been a source of cheap labor? Why or why not?
    2. Was the Chinese Exclusion Act only objectionable because it was specifically against the Chinese? Would it be okay if it legislated against all immigrants regardless of ethnicity? Why or why not?
    3. What role did race play in the legislation? Was it merely a convenient tool to identify the source of the economic woes, or was it the primary purpose behind the law?
    4. Assuming race is an unacceptable reason to exclude a class of immigrants, is there an acceptable criteria? If so, what are they? If not, why?

    Chew on This

    The Chinese Exclusion Act used race as a smokescreen to hide its true economic agenda, of keeping wages at an artificially high level.

    The Chinese Exclusion Act was a racist law that hid behind economics as a way to persecute a specific population of immigrants.

  • Prejudice

    The people who wrote the Chinese Exclusion Act didn't get to know any Chinese people. They were judging the entirety of an entire ethnic group without meeting them.

    Prejudice and racism are closely related, but they're not 100% the same thing. They often manifest identically, so it doesn't make a whole lot of difference. Racism is a dislike of a certain "race" (as defined by the person doing the disliking), and usually carries with it the idea that the racist is in the powerful majority ethnic group and the disliked party is a smaller group. Prejudice can be about anything. (It's usually race, though.)

    Questions About Prejudice

    1. Could the Chinese Exclusion Act exist in a later era when people of Chinese descent were more common? Can familiarity with the variety present in every ethnic group mean these kinds of laws would be impossible?
    2. What exactly was the Chinese Exclusion Act pre-judging about the Chinese laborers? Their race? Religion? Economic impact? All of these things? Are any of them okay to pre-judge? Which, and why?
    3. Prejudice in law enforcement has been a contentious conversation topic in recent years. People who dress a certain way or are of a certain race may be thought to be affiliated with organized crime, and so on. Why is, or why isn't, prejudice in this vein unacceptable? How might perception of police further impact social equity?
    4. Meeting every member of an ethnic group, religion, or political affiliation is impossible. Does this mean a certain amount of prejudice is inevitable? Why or why not? Do we harbor implicit biases against certain groups different than our own? If so, are we able to train ourselves out of these biases?

    Chew on This

    The Chinese Exclusion Act used prejudice against the Chinese as a convenient lever to enact necessary legislation to protect jobs.

    Prejudice of this kind can only find a home in ignorance, and diversity is the best way to combat such ignorance.

  • Majority vs. Minority

    Any situation involving racism or prejudice is probably going to have shades of the struggle between majority and minority. Generally, the majority wants to protect what they have, while the minority would like a piece of the pie, please and thank you.

    With the Chinese Exclusion Act, the majority were the white workers, while the minority was the Chinese immigrant labor force.

    Questions About Majority vs. Minority

    1. Do majorities actually hate and fear minorities, or are they a convenient proxy for something else? Are the pressures primarily social, economic, or cultural? If so, what?
    2. Sometimes, as with Apartheid-era South Africa, it's the minorities with all the power. Does this change the nature of the struggle between the groups? Why or why not?
    3. The Chinese Exclusion Act was a struggle between the majority of white laborers, and two minorities, the wealthy labor-owners, and the Chinese laborers. Why were the Chinese the only minority victimized?
    4. Majorities become minorities over time and vice versa. How does this change the nature of the struggle between the groups? How has it in the past?

    Chew on This

    Though the Chinese immigrants ended up the scapegoats of the white labor force, it was a masterful ploy by the moneyed interests to distract hostility from them.

    Though by today's standards the Chinese Exclusion Act is unconscionably racist, it did address a reality of the economics of labor by removing a significant minority in the labor force.

  • Foreignness and "the Other"

    Before the 20th century, most of the immigrants coming to America were Europeans. Most of those were western European Protestants, too. So not just white people, but a very specific kind of white people. As the country got a significant population of Catholics, there was a lot of friction. The United States didn't have a Catholic president until 1960, and even then, his religion was brought up in the opposition campaign as a negative.

    Most Chinese laborers were way more different that what Americans were used to. They were generally not Christians. They spoke a language totally different and alien-sounding to American ears. They didn't look like white people, or Native Americans, African-Americans, or Latinos. They were, in short, the dreaded Other.*

    *The above has been an attempted deep dive into the minds of 19th-century narrow-minded people.

    Questions About Foreignness and "the Other"

    1. How much of the Chinese Exclusion Act was motivated by the vast differences between Chinese and American cultures at this time? Is this the reason that the Chinese were the first ethnic group to be discriminated in this fashion? How so?
    2. How did the Chinese Exclusion Act continue to promote a sense of otherness for Chinese immigrants?
    3. This act was considered important enough to modify an existing treaty. Would a more familiar culture be dealt with the same way? Why or why not? What was the important difference?
    4. How do xenophobia and racism relate with the concept of foreignness? Is this a human issue or a cultural one? Why and how so?

    Chew on This

    China's being seen as an extremely foreign country by the standards of 19th Century America made its immigrants vulnerable to this kind of legislation.

    The Chinese Exclusion Act created a foreign population in the borders of the United States, and helped keep the Chinese-American population as the "other" within their own country.

This is a premium product

Tired of ads?

Join today and never see them again.

Please Wait...