(7) Snow Line

Court cases need to be thorough and specific, and they need to reference past cases and scientific research.

Sounds like a barrel of laughs, right?

Well, Miranda v. Arizona does all of these things. While legal jargon can tend to drag on, there are easily-catchable moments in this text that sum things up nicely. Earl Warren has some great one-liners about what ought to be (or ought not to be) true and right, and they're placed at just the right point to break up some of the heavier stuff.