How we cite our quotes: Citations follow this format: (Chapter.Paragraph)
Quote #1
From father to son, they clung to the ancestral house with singular tenacity of home attachment. For various reasons, however, and from impressions often too vaguely founded to be put on paper, the writer cherishes the belief that many, if not most, of the successive proprietors of this estate were troubled with doubts as to their moral right to hold it. Of their legal tenure there could be no question; but old Matthew Maule, it is to be feared, trode downward from his own age to a far later one, planting a heavy footstep, all the way, on the conscience of a Pyncheon. If so, we are left to dispose of the awful query, whether each inheritor of the property—conscious of wrong, and failing to rectify it—did not commit anew the great guilt of his ancestor, and incur all its original responsibilities. And supposing such to be the case, would it not be a far truer mode of expression to say of the Pyncheon family, that they inherited a great misfortune, than the reverse? (1.26)
Every time each new generation of Pyncheons decides to live in this tainted house they repeat the original sin of stealing from Matthew Maule. Is this just? What moral code does Hawthorne apply here? How much responsibility do you think families should bear for the wrongs of their ancestors?
Quote #2
I can assure you that this is a modern face, and one which you will very probably meet. Now, the remarkable point is, that the original wears, to the world's eye, – and, for aught I know, to his most intimate friends, – an exceedingly pleasant countenance, indicative of benevolence, openness of heart, sunny good-humor, and other praiseworthy qualities of that cast. The sun, as you see, tells quite another story, and will not be coaxed out of it, after half a dozen patient attempts on my part. Here we have the man, sly, subtle, hard, imperious, and, withal, cold as ice. Look at that eye! Would you like to be at its mercy? At that mouth! Could it ever smile? And yet, if you could only see the benign smile of the original! It is so much the more unfortunate, as he is a public character of some eminence, and the likeness was intended to be engraved. (6.20)
Obviously Hawthorne has a heavy hand with the symbols. Mr. Holgrave's daguerreotype brings out the side of Judge Pyncheon most of the world never sees: his coldness, cruelty, and ambition. We see these sides of Pyncheon's character before we meet him in person in the novel. It's striking how much faith Hawthorne seems to put in appearances. Judge Pyncheon is unusual in the novel in that his appearance is deceptive. He is a hypocrite, so he can hide his essentially evil nature. But characters like Phoebe and Mr. Holgrave look exactly like what they are: kind, quiet, and decent folk. Is it that their faces determine their characters, or that their characters determines their faces? How do you feel about this idea that we look like what we are (unless we're particularly crafty, like Judge Pyncheon)? How much can a person's appearance truly tell us about them?
Quote #3
It was very remarkable into what prominent relief—even as if a dim picture should leap suddenly from its canvas—Clifford's character was thrown by this apparently trifling annoyance [of the jangle of the shop bell]. The secret was, that an individual of his temper can always be pricked more acutely through his sense of the beautiful and harmonious than through his heart. It is even possible – for similar cases have often happened – that if Clifford, in his foregoing life, had enjoyed the means of cultivating his taste to its utmost perfectibility, that subtile attribute might, before this period, have completely eaten out or filed away his affections. Shall we venture to pronounce, therefore, that his long and black calamity may not have had a redeeming drop of mercy at the bottom? (7.48)
This scene of Clifford's first appearance in the novel is really interesting. Up until now, we've gotten a romantic image of Clifford's sensitivity and delicacy from the miniature portrait that Hepzibah treasures so much. But with Clifford's actual appearance, we see the flip side of his sensitivity: he cares more about beauty than about people. He is horrified and annoyed by the jangle of Hepzibah's shop bell, without asking why she might need to open a shop. Hepzibah must explain (with dignity) that the family is very poor. Clifford then points out (to his credit) that Hepzibah's having to open a shop seems like less of a blot on the family name than his having spent 30 years in jail. We find it intriguing to note that Hawthorne sees some good coming out of Clifford's long imprisonment: without that injustice, his nature might have led him to grow totally spoiled and selfish. So there does seem to be a silver lining to Clifford's unhappy fate.
Quote #4
Then, all at once, it struck Phoebe that this very Judge Pyncheon was the original of the miniature which the daguerreotypist had shown her in the garden, and that the hard, stern, relentless look, now on his face, was the same that the sun had so inflexibly persisted in bringing out. Was it, therefore, no momentary mood, but, however skilfully concealed, the settled temper of his life? And not merely so, but was it hereditary in him, and transmitted down, as a precious heirloom, from that bearded ancestor, in whose picture both the expression and, to a singular degree, the features of the modern Judge were shown as by a kind of prophecy? A deeper philosopher than Phoebe might have found something very terrible in this idea. It implied that the weaknesses and defects, the bad passions, the mean tendencies, and the moral diseases which lead to crime are handed down from one generation to another, by a far surer process of transmission than human law has been able to establish in respect to the riches and honors which it seeks to entail upon posterity. (8.14)
The narrator is drawing attention to one of the main themes of the book: inheritance. It's a matter of genetics that each generation of Pyncheons appears to give in to the family's specific "weaknesses and defects": false pride, vanity, and hypocrisy. The Pyncheon family character almost seems like fate. Judge Pyncheon has been doomed to be just like Colonel Pyncheon from the moment of his birth. But the narrator draws this conclusion using weirdly indirect language. He poses a bunch of rhetorical questions and puts his conclusions in the mouth of "a deeper philosopher than Phoebe." Hawthorne wants to draw out the suspense of how, exactly, Judge Pyncheon will prove to be like Colonel Pyncheon while still making the parallels between the two visible at the outset.
Quote #5
Alas, poor Clifford! You are old, and worn with troubles that ought never to have befallen you. You are partly crazy and partly imbecile; a ruin, a failure, as almost everybody is, – though some in less degree, or less perceptibly, than their fellows. Fate has no happiness in store for you; unless your quiet home in the old family residence with the faithful Hepzibah, and your long summer afternoons with Phoebe, and these Sabbath festivals with Uncle Venner and the daguerreotypist, deserve to be called happiness! Why not? If not the thing itself, it is marvellously like it, and the more so for that ethereal and intangible quality which causes it all to vanish at too close an introspection. Take it, therefore, while you may. (10.27)
Here the narrator pretends to address Clifford Pyncheon directly. He informs Clifford that "fate has no happiness in store" for him. But Hawthorne is fate for Clifford: after all, he's the author and Clifford is his character. Not only does Hawthorne get to decide whether Clifford is going to be happy, he's also the one who determines whether Clifford wants happiness in the first place. We find this moment of direct address to be quite odd, really. It's basically Hawthorne's long, roundabout way of saying "seize the day! You never know what tomorrow will bring!" So it's not truly addressed to Clifford – it's really addressed to the reader.
Quote #6
As to the main point, – may we never live to doubt it!—as to the better centuries that are coming, the artist was surely right. His error lay in supposing that this age, more than any past or future one, is destined to see the tattered garments of Antiquity exchanged for a new suit, instead of gradually renewing themselves by patchwork; in applying his own little life-span as the measure of an interminable achievement; and, more than all, in fancying that it mattered anything to the great end in view whether he himself should contend for it or against it. Yet it was well for him to think so. This enthusiasm, infusing itself through the calmness of his character, and thus taking an aspect of settled thought and wisdom, would serve to keep his youth pure, and make his aspirations high. And when, with the years settling down more weightily upon him, his early faith should be modified by inevitable experience, it would be with no harsh and sudden revolution of his sentiments. He would still have faith in man's brightening destiny, and perhaps love him all the better, as he should recognize his helplessness in his own behalf; and the haughty faith, with which he began life, would be well bartered for a far humbler one at its close, in discerning that man's best directed effort accomplishes a kind of dream, while God is the sole worker of realities. (12.18)
Hawthorne approves of Mr. Holgrave's idealism because it keeps him young. But he doesn't agree with Mr. Holgrave's faith that he can revolutionize the world. Each new age holds on to Antiquity, according to Hawthorne. Why does Hawthorne view the past as something that's always with us? How does his analysis of Mr. Holgrave's ideals fit with the plot and the more general themes of The House of the Seven Gables?
Quote #7
To a disposition like Holgrave's, at once speculative and active, there is no temptation so great as the opportunity of acquiring empire over the human spirit; nor any idea more seductive to a young man than to become the arbiter of a young girl's destiny. Let us, therefore, – whatever his defects of nature and education, and in spite of his scorn for creeds and institutions, – concede to the daguerreotypist the rare and high quality of reverence for another's individuality. Let us allow him integrity, also, forever after to be confided in; since he forbade himself to twine that one link more which might have rendered his spell over Phoebe indissoluble. (14.2)
The moral difference between Mr. Holgrave and Judge Pyncheon becomes clear at this moment. It's not simply that Holgrave doesn't feel the lure of dominating other people. On the contrary, there is "no temptation so great" for him as the opportunity to control another. But Holgrave faces this temptation and refuses to do to Phoebe what Matthew Maule II does to Alice Pyncheon. He refuses to use her as a tool the way Judge Pyncheon might. Mr. Holgrave is strong enough to control someone else, but he chooses not to.
This choice is really interesting, because much of the novel seems to question whether Judge Pyncheon, for example, has any choice about what kind of person he is. The Pyncheon family passes down evil in its genes the way other families pass down blue eyes. So Mr. Holgrave appears to have much more freedom of choice than Judge Pyncheon. What are the differences between the two men that make this freedom possible for one and impossible for the other?
Quote #8
Alas, Cousin Jaffrey, this hard and grasping spirit has run in our blood these two hundred years. You are but doing over again, in another shape, what your ancestor before you did, and sending down to your posterity the curse inherited from him! (15.41)
Here Hepzibah basically comes out and states the whole dilemma of fate in The House of the Seven Gables: Judge Jaffrey Pyncheon has been fated to be "hard and grasping" ever since the foundation of the Pyncheon family 200 years earlier. He can't escape the inevitable.
Quote #9
Meanwhile, looking from the window, they could see the world racing past them. At one moment, they were rattling through a solitude; the next, a village had grown up around them; a few breaths more, and it had vanished, as if swallowed by an earthquake. The spires of meeting-houses seemed set adrift from their foundations; the broad-based hills glided away. Everything was unfixed from its age-long rest, and moving at whirlwind speed in a direction opposite to their own. (17.10)
Even though Clifford has expressly stated that he hates newfangled things (especially "the steam-devil" (11.2), i.e., the train), now that he is free of Judge Pyncheon, he is fully embracing the new. The shift of setting in Chapter 17 from the House of the Seven Gables to this new railway line symbolizes the way in which Hepzibah and Clifford have suddenly shaken free of the past. They have suddenly joined the rest of society – even if the rest of society still doesn't entirely understand either of them. Hawthorne comments on this sudden action: "after so long estrangement from everything that the world acted or enjoyed, they had been drawn into the great current of human life [...] as if by the suction of fate itself" (17.6).
Quote #10
What we call real estate—the solid ground to build a house on—is the broad foundation on which nearly all the guilt of this world rests. A man will commit almost any wrong, – he will heap up an immense pile of wickedness, as hard as granite, and which will weigh as heavily upon his soul, to eternal ages, – only to build a great, gloomy, dark-chambered mansion, for himself to die in, and for his posterity to be miserable in. He lays his own dead corpse beneath the underpinning, as one may say, and hangs his frowning picture on the wall, and, after thus converting himself into an evil destiny, expects his remotest great-grandchildren to be happy there. I do not speak wildly. I have just such a house in my mind's eye! (17.34)
Clifford asks how a man's "remotest great-grandchildren" can be happy under the "frowning picture" of his "own dead corpse." What purpose might a man have in putting his "frowning picture" on the wall of his family home? Don't his "remotest great-grandchildren" have the right and the ability to ignore him if they choose? Is family influence really so unavoidable as Clifford makes it out to be? What's more, how can an ancestor deprive his descendants of choice?