The Prince Warfare Quotes

How we cite our quotes: (Chapter.Paragraph)

Quote #1

Again this is in the normal, natural way of things: a ruler is bound to upset the people in his new territories, first with his occupying army and then with all the endless injustices consequent on any invasion. (3.1)

What, exactly, is "normal" and "natural" about "endless injustices?" We're not sure if Machiavelli deserved all the bad press he got when The Prince was published, but with quotes like this it's not too hard to see why people were pissed.

Quote #2

Someone might object: but Louis gave Romagna to Pope Alexander and Naples to Spain to avoid war; in which case, let me repeat what I said earlier: you must never fail to respond to trouble just to avoid war, because in the end you won't avoid it, you'll just be putting it off to your enemy's advantage. (3.16)

Machiavelli tells us elsewhere that fortune favors impulsive dudes. Cautious, peace-loving bros? Not her type.

Quote #3

But once you have won and routed the enemy and made sure he can't rebuild his armies, then the only thing to worry about is the king and his family. Eliminate them and no one else can threaten you since no one commands the loyalty of the people. (4.3)

With his simple and clear language, Machiavelli makes killing whole families seem as inconsequential as swatting a fly or Raid-ing an ant pile.

Quote #4

It wasn't a question of the abilities of each particular conqueror, but of the different kinds of state they had invaded. (4.5)

And here's the whole point of this book summed up in a neat little sentence: to see the results of certain conquerors mixing with certain states.

Quote #5

The fact is that mercenaries bring only slow, belated, unconvincing victories, then sudden, bewildering defeats. (12.8)

We dare you to count the number of times that Machiavelli tells us that mercenaries are bad. Go ahead. We'll wait.

Quote #6

One of the things historians admired about the Achaean leader Philopoemen was that even in peacetime he thought of nothing but military strategy and when he was in the country with his friends he would often stop and ask them: If the enemy were over there on that hill and we were down here with our army, who would be in the better position? How could we attack them without breaking ranks? If we decided to retreat, how would we do it? And if they retreated, how would we go after them? And as he and his friends went along he would list all the predicaments an army can find itself in. He listened to their ideas, expressed and explained his own; so much so that, thanks to this constant work of mental preparation, when he was back leading his armies there was simply nothing that could happen that he didn't know how to deal with. (14.4)

It makes sense that the best ruler at the time would know a lot about war. Diplomacy was about as advanced as nanotechnology, so it was make war or get invaded.

Quote #7

Another thing a ruler must do to exercise his mind is read history, in particular accounts of great leaders and their achievements. He should look at their wartime strategies and study the reasons for their victories and defeats so as to avoid the failures and imitate the successes. (14.5)

There's Machiavelli's humanist side showing. Looking back to the past to make the future even more awesome? Clever, very clever.

Quote #8

Nothing wins a ruler respect like great military victories and a display of remarkable personal qualities. (21.1)

Notice which one of these Machiavelli puts first. Also notice that it's only a "display" of remarkable personal qualities. Hmm.

Quote #9

Either way it will always be better to take sides and fight hard. If you do have cause to fear but stay neutral, you'll still be gobbled up by the winner to the amusement and satisfaction of the loser; you'll have no excuses, no defence and nowhere to hide. Because a winner doesn't want half-hearted friends who don't help him in a crisis; and the loser will have nothing to do with you since you didn't choose to fight alongside him and share his fate. (21.3)

Machiavelli would have harsh words for Switzerland. There's no neutrality in 16th-century Italy.

Quote #10

Justice is definitely on our side because 'war is just when there's no alternative and arms are sacred when they are your only hope.' (26.3)

This quote from Livy's History of Rome makes us wonder if war is ever just. Didn't Machiavelli say earlier in the book that war is full of endless injustices? What's up with that?