How we cite our quotes: (Chapter.Paragraph)
Quote #1
San Narciso lay further south, near L.A. Like many named places in California it was less an identifiable city than a grouping of concepts—census tracts, special purpose bond-issue districts, shopping nuclei, all overlaid with access roads to its own freeway. (2.2)
What is the relationship between geography and legal entities that we call cities? Is this relationship more arbitrary in America than elsewhere?
Quote #2
"Who cares? We don't try to make scripture out of it. Naturally that's cost us a lot of support in the Bible Belt, where we might've been expected to go over real good. The old Confederacy." (3.22)
How is Pynchon poking fun at extremist American right-wing groups through the character of Mike Fallopian?
Quote #3
Turned out Fallopian was doing a history of private mail delivery in the U.S., attempting to link the Civil War to the postal reform movement that had begun around 1845 [...] He saw it as a parable of power, its feeding, growth, and systematic abuse, though he didn't go into it that far with her, that particular night. (3.54)
Why would the great postal reform movement coincide with the Civil War? Who would have been more opposed to a government monopoly on mail: the North or the South?
Quote #4
For here were God knew how many citizens, deliberately choosing not to communicate by US Mail. It was not an act of treason, nor possibly even of defiance. But it was a calculated withdrawal, from the life of the Republic, from its machinery. Whatever else was being denied them out of hate, indifference to the power of their vote, loopholes, simple ignorance, this withdrawal was their own, unpublicized, private. (5.102)
Does this withdrawal strike you as something that could actually happen in America? Do you think the American underground is bothered that the government (had) a monopoly on the means of communication? Where is the seed of truth in Pynchon's crazy conspiracy theory?
Quote #5
You have stumbled [...] onto a network by which X number of Americans are truly communicating whilst reserving their lies, recitations of routine, arid betrayals of spiritual poverty, for the official government delivery system; maybe even onto a real alternative to the exitlessness, to the absence of the surprise to life, that harrows the head of everybody American you know. (6.116)
What is this "exitlessness" that Oedipa sees in America? Is she simply attaching her own personal problems to a vision of the Republic? What does this sense of "the absence of the surprise to life" say about America going into the 1960s?
Quote #6
She turned, pivoting on one stacked heel, could find no mountains either. As if there could be no barriers between herself and the rest of the land. San Narciso at that moment lost (the loss pure, instant, spherical, the sound of a stainless orchestral chime held among the stars and struck lightly), gave up its residue of uniqueness for her; became a name again, was assumed back into the American continuity of crust and mantle. (6.143)
At the end of the novel, the significance of the Tristero quickly moves beyond San Narciso to America as a whole. What causes Oedipa to have this revelation so suddenly? Is it believable?
Quote #7
San Narciso was a name, an incident among our climactic records of dreams and what dreams became among our accumulated daylight, a moment's squall-line or tornado's touchdown among the higher, more continental solemnities—storm-systems of group suffering and need, prevailing winds of affluence. There was the true continuity, San Narciso had no boundaries. No one knew yet how to draw them. She had dedicated herself, weeks ago, to making sense of what Inverarity had left behind, never suspecting that the legacy was America. (6.144)
How is Oedipa moving away from the obsession with the Tristero conspiracy here? Does her sense of compassion for the American dispossessed seem new? What do you make of her characterization of the American population: "storm-systems of group suffering and need"?
Quote #8
What was left to inherit? That America coded in Inverarity's testament, whose was that? (6.147)
How does Inverarity's will "encode" a vision of America? What vision of America is Oedipa trying to articulate here, and what is its relationship to the Tristero? How important is the idea of inheritance to our American vision?
Quote #9
For there either was some Tristero beyond the appearance of the legacy America, or there was just America and if there was just America then it seemed the only way she could continue, and manage to be at all relevant to it, was as an alien, unfurrowed, assumed full circle into some paranoia. (6.148)
Why would the existence of Tristero keep Oedipa from feeling like "an alien"? What causes Oedipa to feel so distanced from mainstream America? To what extent is her sense of alienation a product of the 1960s? Is this paranoid vision of America still relevant today?