ShmoopTube

Where Monty Python meets your 10th grade teacher.

Search Thousands of Shmoop Videos


AP U.S. Government and Politics Videos 87 videos

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Constitutional Foundations
235 Views

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Constitutional Foundations. Which amendment stated that the right to vote could not be denied on the basis of race?

AP U.S. Government 1.3 Institutions of National Government
187 Views

AP U.S. Government 1.3 Institutions of National Government. What did the Twenty-fifth Amendment do?

AP U.S. Government 3.1 Institutions of National Government
207 Views

AP U.S. Government 3.1 Institutions of National Government. In what case did the Court hold that there was a Constitutional right to marital privacy?

See All

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Institutions of National Government 216 Views


Share It!


Description:

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Institutions of National Government. In what case did the Supreme Court first rule a state action unconstitutional, thereby strengthening its power of judicial review?

Language:
English Language

Transcript

00:00

Thank you We sneak and here's your shmoop du jour

00:05

brought to you by judicial review the all night study

00:09

sash for first year law students In what case did

00:12

the supreme court first rule a state action unconstitutional thereby

00:17

strengthening its power of judicial review and hear the potential

00:21

answers Okay here we go Well the constitution's framers laid

00:27

down some pretty strict rules for setting up parts of

00:30

the new government But when it came to the judicial

00:32

branch they courted a less specific approach Not only did

00:36

the framers leave it to congress to set up most

00:39

of the court system they also gave those courts permission

00:41

to set many of their own powers including judicial review

00:46

the ability to strike down laws they believe to be

00:49

unconstitutional Did the supreme court first rule a state action

00:54

unconstitutional in a marbury versus madison Well marbury v madison

00:59

was all about appointments No not the doctor kind but

01:02

rather judicial appointments All right Well long story short John

01:05

adams wanted to appoint a bunch of federalist judges to

01:09

the court as a sort of screw you to thomas

01:12

jefferson the democratic republican who would soon be assuming the

01:15

presidency But jefferson caught onto adam's court packing plan so

01:19

he and secretary of state james madison refused to deliver

01:23

marbury His official appointment papers Even the case got its

01:27

name Yeah well marbury got in a tizzy about the

01:30

whole thing and went to the supreme court hoping for

01:32

a favorable ruling from fellow federalist and now chief justice

01:36

john marshall Well marshall had other plans He ruled that

01:40

parts of the judiciary act of seventeen eighty nine a

01:43

law passed by congress giving the supreme court the ability

01:45

toe weigh in on cases like marbury's were actually unconstitutional

01:50

The marbury v madison was in fact a landmark case

01:53

for judicial review But at the national level not the

01:56

state Did the supreme court first find a state action

02:00

unconscious stick to sh inal in be little v bar

02:03

eam wel l v b was all about a little

02:07

misunderstanding You see congress passed a law that said that

02:10

navy could seize any vote that was sailing to a

02:13

french port Since we were in a quiz i war

02:16

with france at the time No really that's what It

02:18

was called Go look it up President john adams didn't

02:21

think that law was strong enough So he ordered the

02:23

navy to seize ships sailing to and from any french

02:27

port That's How Captain little got swept up into the

02:30

sea change of judicial affairs He was sailing from a

02:33

french port and his appeal the supreme court led to

02:35

adam's Being found in the wrong sensing a pattern here

02:39

So little veba dream was the first time the supreme

02:42

court held an executive action not a state action to

02:47

be unconstitutional All right well did the supreme court first

02:50

exercise judicial review against the state law Indeed gibbons v

02:54

ogden i will gibbons and ogden were two folks bickering

02:57

over who held the rights to operate a steamboat between

03:01

new jersey and new york city Sounds little wishy washy

03:04

tow us Ogden held the license for the route that

03:07

was issued by the state of new york Gibbons obtained

03:10

his license from the u s congress Well the supreme

03:13

court ruled in favor of gibbons saying that the u

03:16

s had authority over the states when it came to

03:18

regulating commerce between two states but that's more about federal

03:23

supremacy over states not a specific state law Yeah it's

03:27

kind of tricky What about ian mccullough Free maryland Essentially

03:31

the state of maryland tried to mess with a branch

03:32

of the u s national bank by imposing a tax

03:35

on any bank that wasn't chartered in maryland What kind

03:37

of funny money businesses that well even though the constitution

03:40

doesn't give congress the express clear power to establish a

03:44

bang It does give congress the power to tax and

03:47

spend and what we need to tax and spend Well

03:50

well bank on uh a bank for that The constitution

03:54

also states that federal laws have supremacy over state laws

03:57

So the supreme court ruled that this particular state act

04:00

was not an act of kindness But this case was

04:02

more about increasing congress implied powers than overruling a state

04:07

law which means that the supreme court first ruled a

04:10

state action unconstitutional in see fletcher be peck fletcher be

04:14

peck had to do with a not so peachy land

04:17

transaction way down in georgia in seventeen ninety five the

04:20

state of georgia sold a bunch of territory under the

04:23

yazoo land act Later on though it was revealed that

04:26

lawmakers passed the yazoo land act in exchange for bribes

04:30

So the new legislature decided to repeal the law in

04:34

void all the contracts of people who had purchased land

04:37

in the transaction Now fletcher bought a tract of land

04:40

from pac The peck had gotten through the seventeen ninety

04:42

five act But once the law was repealed both of

04:45

them landed in oil Quite a pickle The supreme court's

04:48

ruled in the eighteen ten case that the act of

04:51

georgia lawmakers to repeal the yazoo land act was unconstitutional

04:56

It voided the sanctity of a sale guaranteed under the

04:59

contract clause of the constitution O c Is that contractually

05:03

correct answer with all these cases john marshall firmly established

05:06

the supreme court's power of judicial review ensuring that justice 00:05:10.514 --> [endTime] would be served at any level

Related Videos

AP U.S. Government 1.1 Institutions of National Government
280 Views

AP U.S. Government 1.1 Institutions of National Government. What was the scale of representation in the House of Representatives when the Constitut...

AP U.S. Government 2.2 Public Policy
39 Views

AP U.S. Government 2.2 Public Policy. What did the Budget Impoundment Control Act do?

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Civil Rights and Liberties
14 Views

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Civil Rights and Liberties. Classifications based on sexual orientation receive...what?

AP U.S. Government 1.3 Political Beliefs and Behaviors
5 Views

AP U.S. Government 1.3 Political Beliefs and Behaviors. What sort of poll would you commission to monitor popularity over three months?

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Constitutional Foundations
235 Views

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Constitutional Foundations. Which amendment stated that the right to vote could not be denied on the basis of race?