Farewell to Manzanar Questions

Bring on the tough stuff - there’s not just one right answer.

  1. Why is the book separated into three parts? Does it really need to be divided that way?
  2. Does Jeanne—as narrator—actually favor men's experiences (like those of her father and brothers) in camp over and above women's experiences?
  3. Is Jeanne, as narrator, too easy on the American government?
  4. Does the focus on Jeanne's growth into a young woman distract from the story of internment or does it make that thread of the story stronger?
  5. Since the whole book is told in flashback, how much can we really trust narrator Jeanne's memories and stories?
  6. Why does Jeanne bother to tell parts of the book through her father's and brother's voices?
  7. Could the book be just as authentic if the author wrote it as a novel and not as a memoir?
  8. What if the book were written from the perspective of Jeanne's father? What would the book sound like?
  9. How much influence do you think Wakatsuki Houston's husband had on the writing of the book (especially considering he's listed as a co-writer)?