King John Warfare Quotes

How we cite our quotes: (Act.Scene.Line)

Quote #1

KING JOHN
What follows if we disallow of this?
CHATILLON
The proud control of fierce and bloody war,
To enforce these rights so forcibly withheld.
KING JOHN
Here have we war for war and blood for blood,
Controlment for controlment: so answer France.
CHATILLON
Then take my king's defiance from my mouth,
The farthest limit of my embassy.
KING JOHN
Bear mine to him, and so depart in peace.
Be thou as lightning in the eyes of France,
For ere thou canst report, I will be there;
The thunder of my cannon shall be heard.
So, hence. Be thou the trumpet of our wrath
And sullen presage of your own decay.—
An honorable conduct let him have.
Pembroke, look to 't.—Farewell, Chatillon. (1.1.16-30)

These are almost the opening lines of the play. From them, don't you get the strong sense that King John and King Philip are two complete egomaniacs? King Philip, at least, has had some time to think about what he is planning to say to King John. But King John, without even batting an eyelash, immediately promises to bring "war for war" and "blood for blood" and "controlment for controlment" against King Philip. Yet hundreds of lives are at stake—the lives of the soldiers, on both King John's and King Philip's sides, who will have to do their raging masters' bidding in this war. Also note the bizarre mood swing that has King John speaking about Châtillon's "own decay" one moment, and then ensuring his safe passage the next. What does this mixture of menace and politeness say about the role of war in King John's (or Shakespeare's) society?

Quote #2

KING JOHN
Come, madam,—and come, Richard. We must
   speed
For France, for France, for it is more than need. (1.1.183-185)

What does King John mean when he says that his mission against France is "more than need"? When he tells Eleanor that he has to hurry to France, it's as if he's saying, "But I don't just need to invade France, I want to, too!" The problem is, when John puts it this way, doesn't it start to make you wonder if it's really "need" at all? And if the war isn't necessary, then isn't it irresponsible and unjust?

Quote #3

AUSTRIA
The peace of heaven is theirs that lift their swords
In such a just and charitable war.
KING PHILIP
Well then, to work. Our cannon shall be bent
Against the brows of this resisting town.
Call for our chiefest men of discipline
To cull the plots of best advantages.
We'll lay before this town our royal bones,
Wade to the market-place in Frenchmen's blood,
But we will make it subject to this boy.
CONSTANCE
Stay for an answer from your embassy,
Lest unadvised you stain your swords with blood.
My Lord Chatillon may from England bring
That right in peace which here we urge in war,
And then we shall repent each drop of blood
That hot rash haste so indirectly shed. (2.1.35-49)

It looks like King John isn't the only one who mixes up what he needs to do and what he wants to do when it comes to waging war: his enemies fall into the same trap. Here, we see Austria and King Philip of France deciding to attack and utterly destroy the town of Angers without even waiting to hear Châtillon report back from King John. The citizens of Angers can thank their lucky stars that Constance had the presence of mind—and sense of justice—to get them to wait for the messenger before killing people.