Social Systems and Altruism
Social animals come from different groups—birds, mammals, and insects can all be social, though of course not every bird, mammal, or insect species is social. Mammalian social groups are usually composed of one male, multiple females, and their offspring. Birds of a feather flock together, as the saying goes. Well, we would too if we were penguins living in the horribly frigid Antarctic.
Termites, ants, wasps, bees, and naked mole rats live in colonies full of worker drones supporting one queen. The queen is the only female that reproduces, and the other animals take care of the house, raise the babies, and find food for everyone. Animals that live in groups and have this division of labor, cooperative care for the young, and reproductive and non-reproductive groups are called eusocial. Eusocial means "truly social," as opposed to "sort-of social" or "not-really-social" or "has never heard of social networking."
Naked mole rats are colonial animals. They live underground, are almost hairless, and are almost completely blind.
Eusocial systems are cool, in evolutionary terms and in real life. From an evolutionary perspective, eusocial systems seem to defy everything we know about evolution—natural selection favors individuals who pass on their genes, so what are all these sterile workers doing raising the queens’ babies? We’ll tell you when you’re older…five minutes older, or however long it takes you to read the next few paragraphs.
Eusocial systems are also cool because they are like extremely well run armies, with soldiers each assigned to different jobs. Watching an ant colony is like watching a finely tuned machine. Ants have complex social structures in which individuals belong to different classes, or castes, including worker, drone, and queen.
All the workers are female and do not reproduce. Male drones are there to mate with the queen, and that is it. They wander around until mating time and die afterwards. It may not be a very glamorous life, but someone has to do it. Female workers divide up the jobs to maintain the colony including foraging, defending the nest, constructing the nest, and taking care of the queen. The queen is all-important in the colony.
In most animal species, individuals are looking out for number one: themselves. Sometimes though, animals do nice things for each other like hold the door and let their neighbors borrow a cup of sugar. Sometimes family members share food, and females occasionally help raise their sisters’ babies and give up their own chance at reproducing. When evolution favors animals helping their family members, it is called kin selection.
Animals that give alarm calls when a predator approaches put themselves at risk by drawing attention to themselves while warning their kin. This type of behavior, where one individual sacrifices some of his or her own fitness for another individual, is called altruism.
Animals are generally really selfish, so the existence of altruism takes some explanation. After all, individuals reducing their own fitness should not be favored by natural selection. Animals that live in family groups or colonies can aid their relatives, increasing the potential for more family members to have babies. More offspring = more of the family genes passed on.
A scientist named William Hamilton came up with a formal rule to predict when altruism is favored by evolution. It depends on how closely related the animals are—siblings share half their genes, so an animal is more likely to help its sibling than say, its third cousin once-removed. We’ll call the relatedness of two individuals r. The benefit of helping relatives is called B, and is measured in the number of extra offspring that result from the aid that is given. The cost to the animal giving the help is called C, and it is the number of fewer offspring the altruist produces as a result of giving help.
Hamilton’s rule states that evolution favors altruism if rB > C. In words, the relatedness times the benefits have to be greater than the cost of not reproducing (or having fewer babies) on the part of the altruist. You share about half of your genes with each of your siblings, so your r value is 0.5. You share about 1/4 of your genes with your parents’ siblings (your aunts and uncles), but only 1/8 of your genes with your cousins. So if the cost of you helping your sister (r = 1/2) raise her kids is one fewer kid for you (C = 1), how many extra kids would your sister have to have for altruism to be favored? Well, (1/2) × B > 1 so B has to be greater than 2. Since kids come in whole numbers, your sister would have to have three extra kids for altruism to be favored.
Hamilton’s rule helps explain evolution of colonial animals. They are all closely related, and they help others raise more offspring. Evolution favors altruism if the benefits of helping others outweigh the costs of helping. So a prairie dog that makes an alarm call may be putting itself at a higher risk of dying, but all of the prairie dogs’ relatives have a better chance of surviving.