King Lear is a tragedy by
William Shakespeare written at some point between 1603 and 1606. The play’s action centers around an aging king who decides to divide his kingdom between his three daughters, two of whom turn out to be mean, greedy ladies. For the past several decades,
King Lear has been regarded as one of Shakespeare’s greatest works, perhaps even better than
Hamlet.
Yet this was not always the case. For much of
Lear’s history, the play was regarded as a theatrical failure. It was too complicated, too dark, too violent. The on-stage blinding of one character was too much. Audiences were upset at the bleakness of the ending and the unfairness of innocent Cordelia’s death. For much of the eighteenth century, the only version of
Lear performed was a re-write that gave the play an improbable happy ending.
But in the 1960s, everything changed. After the
Holocaust and two World Wars, the vision of human life presented in
King Lear didn’t seem overly cynical – it seemed pretty realistic. The play’s graphic violence suddenly seemed appropriate. So did
Lear’s suggestion that gods either don’t exist or, if they do, they like to torture humans. Critic
Jan Kott famously compared
Lear to
Samuel Beckett’s twentieth century
Existentialist plays,
Endgame and
Waiting for Godot. Productions of
Lear multiplied, and it’s been riding a high tide of popularity ever since.